FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529  
530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   >>   >|  
eater_ and _Lesser_ India, I would recall attention to what has been said about Greater and Lesser Java (supra, chap. ix. note 1). Greater India was originally intended, I imagine, for the _real_ India, what our maps call Hindustan. And the threefold division, with its inclination to place one of the Indies in Africa, I think may have originated with the Arab _Hind_, _Sind_, and _Zinj_. I may add that our vernacular expression "the Indies" is itself a vestige of the twofold or threefold division of which we have been speaking. The partition of the Indies made by King Sebastian of Portugal in 1571, when he constituted his eastern possessions into three governments, recalled the old division into Three Indias. The first, INDIA, extending from Cape Gardafui to Ceylon, stood in a general way for Polo's India Major; the second MONOMOTAPA, from Gardafui to Cape Corrientes (India Tertia of Jordanus); the third MALACCA, from Pegu to China (India Minor). (_Faria y Souza_, II. 319.) Polo's knowledge of India, _as a whole_, is so little exact that it is too indefinite a problem to consider which are the three kingdoms that he has _not_ described. The ten which he has described appear to be--(1) Maabar, (2) Coilum, (3) Comari, (4) Eli, (5) Malabar, (6) Guzerat, (7) Tana, (8) Canbaet, (9) Semenat, (10) Kesmacoran. On the one hand, this distribution in itself contains serious misapprehensions, as we have seen, and on the other there must have been many dozens of kingdoms in India Major instead of 13, if such states as Comari, Hili, and Somnath were to be separately counted. Probably it was a common saying that there were 12 kings in India, and the fact of his having himself described so many, which he knew did not nearly embrace the whole, may have made Polo convert this into 13. Jordanus says: "In this Greater India are 12 idolatrous kings and more;" but his Greater India is much more extensive than Polo's. Those which he names are _Molebar_ (probably the kingdom of the Zamorin of Calicut), _Singuyli_ (Cranganor), _Columbum_ (Quilon), _Molephatan_ (on the east coast, uncertain, see above pp. 333, 391), and _Sylen_ (Ceylon), _Java_, three or four kings, _Telenc_ (Polo's Mutfili), _Maratha_ (Deogir), _Batigala_ (in Canara), and in _Champa_ (apparently put for all Indo-China) many kings. According to Firishta there were about a dozen _important_ principalities in India at the time of the Mahomedan conquest of which he mentions _eleve
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529  
530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Greater

 

division

 

Indies

 
Gardafui
 

Ceylon

 

Lesser

 
Jordanus
 

threefold

 

Comari

 
kingdoms

misapprehensions

 

distribution

 

embrace

 

Kesmacoran

 

Somnath

 

states

 

common

 

Probably

 

counted

 

dozens


separately

 

Zamorin

 

Canara

 

Batigala

 

Champa

 

apparently

 

Deogir

 

Maratha

 
Telenc
 

Mutfili


Mahomedan
 
conquest
 
mentions
 

principalities

 

According

 

Firishta

 

important

 

Molebar

 

extensive

 

idolatrous


kingdom

 

Semenat

 

uncertain

 

Molephatan

 

Quilon

 

Calicut

 

Singuyli

 

Cranganor

 

Columbum

 
convert