FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1749   1750   1751   1752   1753   1754   1755   1756   1757   1758   1759   1760   1761   1762   1763   1764   1765   1766   1767   1768   1769   1770   1771   1772   1773  
1774   1775   1776   1777   1778   1779   1780   1781   1782   1783   1784   1785   1786   1787   1788   1789   1790   1791   1792   1793   1794   1795   1796   1797   1798   >>   >|  
e of the rhythmic art be in no degree advanced by their productions, new or old. For the supposition is, that in general the consulters of these various oracles are persons more fallible still, and therefore likely to be misled by any errors that are not expressly pointed out to them. In this work, it is assumed, that _quantity_, not laboriously ascertained by "a great variety of rules applied from the Greek and Latin Prosody," but discriminated on principles of our own--_quantity_, dependent in some degree on the nature and number of the letters in a syllable, but still more on the presence or absence of stress--is the true foundation of our metre. It has already been stated, and perhaps proved, that this theory is as well supported by authority as any; but, since Lindley Murray, persuaded wrong by the positiveness of Sheridan, exchanged his scheme of feet formed by quantities, for a new one of "feet formed by accents"--or, rather, for an impracticable mixture of both, a scheme of supposed "_duplicates_ of each foot"--it has been becoming more and more common for grammarians to represent the basis of English versification to be, not the distinction of long and short quantities, but the recurrence of _accent_ at certain intervals. Such is the doctrine of Butler, Felton, Fowler, S. S. Greene, Hart, Hiley, R. C. Smith, Weld, Wells, and perhaps others. But, in this, all these writers contradict themselves; disregard their own definitions of accent; count monosyllables to be accented or unaccented; displace emphasis from the rank which Murray and others give it, as "the great regulator of quantity;" and suppose the length or shortness of syllables not to depend on the presence or absence of either accent or emphasis; and not to be of much account in the construction of English verse. As these strictures are running to a great length, it may be well now to introduce the poetic feet, and to reserve, for notes under that head, any further examination of opinions as to what constitutes the _foundation_ of verse. SECTION III.--OF POETIC FEET. A verse, or line of poetry., consists of successive combinations of syllables, called _feet_. A poetic _foot_, in English, consists either of two or of three syllables, as in the following examples: 1. "C=an t=y | -r~ants b=ut | b~y t=y | -r~ants c=on | -qu~ered b=e?"--_Byron_. 2. "H=ol~y, | h=ol~y, | h=ol~y! | =all th~e | s=aints ~a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1749   1750   1751   1752   1753   1754   1755   1756   1757   1758   1759   1760   1761   1762   1763   1764   1765   1766   1767   1768   1769   1770   1771   1772   1773  
1774   1775   1776   1777   1778   1779   1780   1781   1782   1783   1784   1785   1786   1787   1788   1789   1790   1791   1792   1793   1794   1795   1796   1797   1798   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

quantity

 

English

 

syllables

 
accent
 

poetic

 

foundation

 

quantities

 

formed

 

degree

 
emphasis

absence

 

presence

 

length

 
Murray
 

consists

 

scheme

 

suppose

 

depend

 

shortness

 

disregard


writers

 
contradict
 
Greene
 

displace

 
unaccented
 

accented

 

definitions

 

monosyllables

 

regulator

 

examples


called

 
poetry
 

successive

 

combinations

 
introduce
 
reserve
 

running

 

construction

 
strictures
 
POETIC

SECTION

 

constitutes

 

examination

 

opinions

 
account
 
variety
 
applied
 

ascertained

 
laboriously
 

assumed