FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1723   1724   1725   1726   1727   1728   1729   1730   1731   1732   1733   1734   1735   1736   1737   1738   1739   1740   1741   1742   1743   1744   1745   1746   1747  
1748   1749   1750   1751   1752   1753   1754   1755   1756   1757   1758   1759   1760   1761   1762   1763   1764   1765   1766   1767   1768   1769   1770   1771   1772   >>   >|  
discern the difference. The division of poetry into its peculiar lines, is therefore not a mere accident. The word _verse_, from the Latin _versus_, literally signifies a _turning_. Each full line of metre is accordingly called a verse; because, when its measure is complete, the writer _turns_ to place another under it. A _verse_, then, in the primary sense of the word with us, is, "A _line_ consisting of a certain succession of sounds, and number of syllables."--_Johnson, Walker, Todd, Bottes_, and others. Or, according to _Webster_, it is, "A poetic _line_, consisting of a certain number of long and short syllables, disposed according to the rules of the species of poetry which the author intends to compose."--See _American Dict._, 8vo. OBS. 2.--If to settle the theory of English verse on true and consistent principles, is as difficult a matter, as the manifold contrarieties of doctrine among our prosodists would indicate, there can be no great hope of any scheme entirely satisfactory to the intelligent examiner. The very elements of the subject are much perplexed by the incompatible dogmas of authors deemed skillful to elucidate it. It will scarcely be thought a hard matter to distinguish true verse from prose, yet is it not well agreed, wherein the difference consists: what the generality regard as the most essential elements or characteristics of the former, some respectable authors dismiss entirely from their definitions of both verse and versification. The existence of quantity in our language; the dependence of our rhythms on the division of syllables into long and short; the concurrence of our accent, (except in some rare and questionable instances,) with long quantity only; the constant effect of emphasis to lengthen quantity; the limitation of quantity to mere duration of sound; the doctrine that quantity pertains to all _syllables_ as such, and not merely to vowel sounds; the recognition of the same general principles of syllabication in poetry as in prose; the supposition that accent pertains not to certain _letters_ in particular, but to certain _syllables_ as such; the limitation of accent to stress, or percussion, only; the conversion of short syllables into long, and long into short, by a change of accent; our frequent formation of long syllables with what are called short vowels; our more frequent formation of short syllables with what are called long or open vowels; the necessity of some order in the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1723   1724   1725   1726   1727   1728   1729   1730   1731   1732   1733   1734   1735   1736   1737   1738   1739   1740   1741   1742   1743   1744   1745   1746   1747  
1748   1749   1750   1751   1752   1753   1754   1755   1756   1757   1758   1759   1760   1761   1762   1763   1764   1765   1766   1767   1768   1769   1770   1771   1772   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

syllables

 
quantity
 

accent

 

called

 

poetry

 
doctrine
 
number
 
matter
 

sounds

 

pertains


limitation

 
consisting
 

vowels

 
authors
 

difference

 
division
 

formation

 

frequent

 

principles

 

elements


respectable

 
characteristics
 

essential

 
scarcely
 

thought

 

elucidate

 
deemed
 
skillful
 

distinguish

 

consists


generality

 

agreed

 
dismiss
 

regard

 

emphasis

 
syllabication
 

supposition

 

letters

 

general

 
recognition

necessity

 

change

 

stress

 

percussion

 

conversion

 

dependence

 
rhythms
 

concurrence

 
language
 

existence