FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910  
911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   >>   >|  
word _interjection_ comes to us from the Latin name _interjectio_, the root of which is the verb _interjicio_, to throw between, to interject. Interjections are so called because they are usually thrown in between _the parts of discourse_, without any syntactical connexion with other words. Dr. Lowth, in his haste, happened to describe them as a kind of natural sounds "thrown in between the parts _of a sentence_;" and this strange blunder has been copied into almost every definition that has been given of the Interjection since. See Murray's Grammar and others. Webster's Dictionary defines it as, "A word thrown in between _words connected in construction_;" but of all the parts of speech none are less frequently found in this situation. OBS. 3.--The following is a fair sample of "Smith's _New Grammar_,"--i.e., of "English Grammar on the _Productive System_,"--a new effort of quackery to scarf up with cobwebs the eyes of common sense: "Q. When I exclaim, 'Oh! I have ruined my friend,' 'Alas! I fear for life,' _which words_ here appear to be thrown in _between the sentences_, to express passion or feeling? Ans. _Oh! Alas!_ Q. What does _interjection_ mean? Ans. _Thrown between_. Q. What name, then, shall we give such words as _oh! alas! &c._? Ans. INTERJECTIONS. Q. What, then, are interjections? Ans. Interjections are words thrown in _between the parts of sentences_, to express the passions or sudden feelings of the speaker. Q. How may an interjection generally be known? Ans. By _its taking_ an exclamation _point_ after it: [as,] '_Oh!_ I have alienated my friend.'"--_R. C. Smith's New Gram._, p. 39. Of the interjection, this author gives, in his examples for parsing, _fifteen_ other instances; but nothing can be more obvious, than that not more than one of the whole fifteen stands either "between sentences" or between the parts of any sentence! (See _New Gram._, pp. 40 and 96.) Can he be a competent grammarian, who does not know the meaning of _between_; or who, knowing it, misapplies so very plain a word? OBS. 4.--The Interjection, which is idly claimed by sundry writers to have been the first of words at the origin of language, is now very constantly set down, among the parts of speech, as the last of the series. But, for the name of this the last of the ten sorts of words, some of our grammarians have adopted the term _exclamation_. Of the old and usual term _interjection_, a recent writer justly says, "This name is
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910  
911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
thrown
 

interjection

 

sentences

 
Grammar
 
Interjection
 

Interjections

 
speech
 

express

 
exclamation
 

friend


fifteen

 

sentence

 

alienated

 

recent

 

writer

 

adopted

 
instances
 

parsing

 

examples

 

author


taking

 
speaker
 

feelings

 

sudden

 

INTERJECTIONS

 
interjections
 

passions

 

justly

 

generally

 

claimed


knowing

 

series

 

misapplies

 

sundry

 

writers

 
language
 
constantly
 

origin

 

meaning

 

stands


obvious

 

competent

 

grammarian

 
grammarians
 

feeling

 
Webster
 

Dictionary

 

defines

 

interject

 

Murray