FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714  
715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   >>   >|  
, the two distinct forms of _thou_ and _you_, are often used promiscuously by our modern poets, in the same paragraph, and even in the same sentence, very inelegantly and improperly:-- 'Now, now, I seize, I clasp _thy_ charms; And now _you burst_, ah cruel! from my arms.'--Pope." --_Lowth's English Gram._, p. 34. OBS. 17.--The points of Dr. Lowth's doctrine which are not sufficiently true, are the following: First, it is not true, that _thou_, in the familiar style, is _totally disused_, and the plural _you_ employed universally in its stead; though Churchill, and others, besides the good bishop, seem to represent it so. It is now nearly two hundred years since the rise of the Society of Friends: and, whatever may have been the practice of others before or since, it is certain, that from their rise to the present day, there have been, at every point of time, many thousands who made no use of _you_ for _thou_; and, but for the clumsy forms which most grammarians hold to be indispensable to verbs of the second person singular, the beautiful, distinctive, and poetical words, _thou, thyself, thy, thine_, and _thee_, would certainly be in no danger yet of becoming obsolete. Nor can they, indeed, at any rate, become so, till the fairest branches of the Christian Church shall wither; or, what should seem no gracious omen, her bishops and clergy learn to _pray in the plural number_, for fashion's sake. Secondly, it is not true, that, "_thou_, who _touch'd_," ought _indispensably_ to be, "_thou_, who _touchedst_, or _didst touch_." It is far better to dispense with the inflection, in such a case, than either to impose it, or to resort to the plural pronoun. The "grammatical inconvenience" of dropping the _st_ or _est_ of a preterit, even in the solemn style, cannot be great, and may be altogether imaginary; that of imposing it, except in solemn prose, is not only real, but is often insuperable. It is not very agreeable, however, to see it added to some verbs, and dropped from others, in the same sentence: as, "Thou, who _didst call_ the Furies from the abyss, And round Orestes _bade_ them howl and hiss." --_Byron's Childe Harold_, Canto iv, st. 132. "Thou _satt'st_ from age to age insatiate, And _drank_ the blood of men, and _gorged_ their flesh." --_Pollok's Course of Time_, B. vii, l. 700. OBS. 18.--We see then, that, according to Dr. Lowth and others, _the only good Engl
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714  
715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
plural
 

sentence

 

solemn

 
Course
 
dispense
 

gorged

 
inflection
 

impose

 
grammatical
 

inconvenience


dropping

 

pronoun

 

resort

 

touchedst

 

bishops

 

clergy

 
gracious
 

wither

 

number

 

indispensably


Pollok

 
fashion
 

Secondly

 

dropped

 

Harold

 
Childe
 

Furies

 

Orestes

 

agreeable

 

insatiate


altogether

 

imaginary

 

imposing

 

preterit

 

insuperable

 
familiar
 
totally
 

disused

 

employed

 

points


doctrine

 

sufficiently

 

universally

 
hundred
 

Society

 
represent
 

bishop

 

Churchill

 

paragraph

 

inelegantly