FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718  
719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   >>   >|  
or no other reason. Dr. Lowth says, "The nature of our language, the accent and pronunciation of it, inclines [incline] us to contract even all our regular verbs: thus _loved, turned_, are commonly pronounced in one syllable _lov'd, turn'd_: and the second person, which was originally in three syllables, _lovedest, turnedest_, is [say _has_] now become a dissyllable, _lovedst, turnedst_."--_Lowth's Gram._, p. 45; _Hiley's_, 45; _Churchill's_, 104. See also _Priestley's Gram._, p. 114; and _Coar's_, p. 102. This latter doctrine, with all its vouchers, still needs confirmation. What is it but an idle conjecture? If it were _true_, a few quotations might easily prove it; but when, and by whom, have any such words as _lovedest, turnedest_, ever been used? For aught I see, the simple _st_ is as complete and as old a termination for the second person singular of an English verb, as _est_; indeed, it appears to be _older_: and, for the preterit, it is, and (I believe) _always has been_, the _most_ regular, if not the _only_ regular, addition. If _sufferedest, woundedest_, and _killedest_, are words more regular than _sufferedst, woundedst, killedst_, then are _heardest, knewest, slewest, sawest, rannest, metest, swammest_, and the like, more regular than _heardst, knewst, slewst, sawst, ranst, metst, swamst, satst, saidst, ledst, fledst, toldst_, and so forth; but not otherwise.[246] So, in the solemn style, we write _seemest, deemest, swimmest_, like _seemeth, deemeth, swimmeth_, and so forth; but, when we use the form which has no increase of syllables, why is an apostrophe more necessary in the second person, than in the third?--in _seemst, deemst, swimst_, than in _seems, deems, swims_? When final _e_ is dropped from the verb, the case is different; as, "Thou _cutst_ my head off with a golden axe, And _smil'st_ upon the stroke that murders me."--_Shakspeare_. OBS. 22.--Dr. Lowth supposes the verbal termination _s_ or _es_ to have come from a contraction of _eth_. He says, "Sometimes, by the rapidity of our pronunciation, the vowels are shortened or lost; and the consonants, which are thrown together, do not coalesce with one another, and are therefore changed into others of the same organ, or of a kindred species. This occasions a farther deviation from _the regular form_: thus, _loveth, turneth_, are contracted into _lov'th, turn'th_, and these, for easier pronunciation, _immediately_ become _loves, turns_."--_Lo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718  
719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
regular
 

person

 
pronunciation
 

turnedest

 
lovedest
 

termination

 

syllables

 

fledst

 

toldst

 

saidst


dropped

 

swimst

 
seemest
 

swimmeth

 

deemeth

 
swimmest
 

deemest

 

seemeth

 

increase

 

deemst


solemn
 

seemst

 

apostrophe

 

verbal

 

changed

 

kindred

 

thrown

 

consonants

 

coalesce

 

species


occasions
 

immediately

 

easier

 
contracted
 

farther

 

deviation

 
loveth
 
turneth
 

shortened

 
stroke

murders

 

golden

 

Shakspeare

 

Sometimes

 

rapidity

 

vowels

 

contraction

 

supposes

 

swamst

 
Priestley