FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723  
724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   >>   >|  
." --_Pollok_, B. ii, l. 5. "'So I believ'd.'--No, Abel! to thy grief, So thou _relinquish'd_ all that was belief." --_Crabbe, Borough_, p. 279. OBS. 27.--L. Murray, and his numerous copyists, Ingersoll, Greenleaf, Kirkham, Fisk, Flint, Comly, Alger, and the rest; though they insist on it, that the _st_ of the second person can never be dispensed with, except in the imperative mood and some parts of the subjunctive; are not altogether insensible of that monstrous harshness which their doctrine imposes upon the language. Some of them tell us to avoid this by preferring the auxiliaries _dost_ and _didst_: as _dost burst_, for _burstest; didst check_, for _checkedst._ This recommendation proceeds on the supposition that _dost_ and _didst_ are smoother syllables than _est_ and _edst_; which is not true: _didst learn_ is harsher than either _learnedst_ or _learntest_; and all three of them are intolerable in common discourse. Nor is the "_energy_, or _positiveness_," which grammarians ascribe to these auxiliaries, always appropriate. Except in a question, _dost_ and _didst_, like _do, does_, and _did_, are usually signs of _emphasis_; and therefore unfit to be substituted for the _st, est_, or _edst_, of an unemphatic verb. Kirkham, who, as we have seen, graces his Elocution with such unutterable things, as "_prob'dst, hurl'dst, arm'dst, want'dst, burn'dst, bark'dst, bubbl'dst, troubbl'dst_," attributes the use of the plural for the singular, to a design of avoiding the raggedness of the latter. "In order to avoid the disagreeable harshness of sound, occasioned by the frequent recurrence of the termination _est, edst_, in the adaptation of our verbs to the nominative _thou_, a _modern innovation_ which substitutes _you_ for _thou_, in familiar style, has generally been adopted. This innovation contributes greatly to the harmony of our colloquial style. _You_ was formerly restricted to the plural number; but now it is employed to represent either a singular or a plural noun."--_Kirkham's Gram._, p. 99. A modern innovation, forsooth! Does not every body know it was current four hundred years ago, or more? Certainly, both _ye_ and _you_ were applied in this manner, to the great, as early as the fourteenth century. Chaucer sometimes used them so, and he died in 1400. Sir T. More uses them so, in a piece dated 1503. "O dere cosyn, Dan Johan, she sayde, What eyleth _you_ so rathe to aryse?"--_C
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723  
724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Kirkham
 

plural

 

innovation

 
modern
 
singular
 

harshness

 
auxiliaries
 

restricted

 
adopted
 

number


contributes

 

generally

 

greatly

 

harmony

 

colloquial

 

nominative

 
attributes
 

troubbl

 

design

 

avoiding


raggedness

 
adaptation
 

termination

 

substitutes

 

familiar

 
recurrence
 

frequent

 

disagreeable

 

occasioned

 

Chaucer


century

 

eyleth

 

fourteenth

 

forsooth

 

things

 
employed
 
represent
 

current

 

applied

 

manner


Certainly

 

hundred

 

question

 
person
 

dispensed

 
insist
 

imperative

 

doctrine

 

imposes

 

language