FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554  
555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   >>   >|  
_ban_ and the _arriere-ban_ or _retro-bannum_. At all events this distinction arose; the _ban_ referring to the vassals called out by the king, and the _arriere-ban_ to the sub-vassals called upon by the vassals in their turn. As in England, the liability to military service was often commuted for a monetary payment, and there were various exemptions. In the 17th and 18th centuries the ban and arriere-ban were lacking in discipline when called out, and were last summoned in 1758. Local levies, however, called out between this date and the Revolution were sometimes referred to by these names. In the medieval Empire and in Germany the word "ban" retained the special sense of punishment. The German equivalent of ban is _Acht_, and the sentence soon became practically one of outlawry. Connected possibly with the power enjoyed in earlier times by the assemblies of freemen of outlawing an offender, it was frequently used by the emperor, or German king, and the phrase "under the ban" is very common in medieval history. The execution of this sentence of placing an offender under the imperial ban, or _Reichsacht_, was usually entrusted to some prince or noble, who was often rewarded with a portion of the outlaw's lands. It was, however, only a serious punishment when the king or his supporters were strong enough to enforce its execution. Employed not only against individuals but also against towns and districts, it was sometimes divided into the _Acht_ and the _Oberacht_, _i.e._ partial or complete outlawry. Documents of the time show that the person placed under the imperial ban drew down absolute destitution upon his relatives and frequently death upon himself. At first this sentence was the act of the [v.03 p.0305] emperor or king himself, but as the Empire became more German, and its administration less personal, it was entrusted to the imperial aulic council (_Reichshofrat_), and to the imperial court of justice or imperial chamber (_Reichskammergericht_). These courts were deprived of this power in 1711, retaining only the right of suggesting its use. The imperial ban had, however, been used for the last time in 1706, when Maximilian Emanuel, elector of Bavaria, was placed under it. There are many other uses of the word in the sense of a prohibition. In earlier French law the ban of wine or _bannum vini_, was the exclusive right of a lord to sell wine during a stated number of days, and the ban of March and April forbad
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554  
555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
imperial
 

called

 
German
 
sentence
 

vassals

 

arriere

 

outlawry

 

medieval

 

punishment

 
Empire

earlier

 

emperor

 
entrusted
 
frequently
 
offender
 

execution

 
bannum
 
personal
 

Reichshofrat

 

council


administration

 

relatives

 

partial

 

complete

 

Documents

 
divided
 
Oberacht
 

events

 

absolute

 

destitution


justice
 
person
 

exclusive

 

French

 
prohibition
 
forbad
 

number

 

stated

 

retaining

 
suggesting

deprived

 

courts

 

Reichskammergericht

 
districts
 

elector

 
Bavaria
 

Emanuel

 

Maximilian

 

chamber

 

Connected