FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591  
592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   >>   >|  
uch discussion, and the consideration of many proposed amendments, the article with seven sections, intended as an amendment to the Constitution, was adopted by sections (not under the rules, being voted on as a whole), and by a vote of the Conference (not taken by States), was directed to be submitted to Congress, with the request that it should be recommended to the States for ratification, which was accordingly done by the President of the Conference. The undersigned regret that the Journal showing the proceedings and votes in the Conference has not yet been published or furnished them, and that consequently they are not able to present it with this report. As soon as received it will be communicated to your Excellency. In the absence of that record it is deemed appropriate to state that on the final adoption of the first section, two of the States, Indiana and Missouri, did not vote, and New York was divided, and that the votes by States was, ayes 9, nays 8--Virginia, by a majority of her Commissioners, voting in the negative. The other sections were adopted by ranging majorities (not precisely recollected), and on the fifth and seventh sections the vote of Virginia was in the negative. The plan, when submitted to Congress, failed to receive its recommendation, and as that body, having adjourned, can take no further cognizance of it, the undersigned feel the contingency has arrived on which they are required to report, as they herein do, the result of their action. Respectfully, JOHN TYLER, G.W. SUMMERS, W.C. RIVES, JAS. A. SEDDON. The above report having been read and ordered to be printed, Mr. SUMMERS stated that the reason it was not signed by Judge BROCKENBROUGH, the other Virginia Commissioner, was because that gentleman was not in Richmond. Mr. SUMMERS presented a communication in which Judge BROCKENBROUGH stated his views at length on the propositions adopted by the Convention, and it was printed, by vote of the Legislature, in connection with the report. After reviewing the different sections of the propositions adopted by the Peace Conference, Judge BROCKENBROUGH, in his letter, states that the said propositions, _as an entirety_, would have received his vote, and therefore the vote of Virginia, in the Peace Conference, if it had been submitted to a vote in that for
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591  
592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

sections

 

Conference

 

adopted

 

Virginia

 

report

 

States

 
propositions
 
SUMMERS
 

submitted

 

BROCKENBROUGH


printed

 
received
 

undersigned

 

stated

 
negative
 

Congress

 

arrived

 
required
 

Respectfully

 

action


result

 

contingency

 

failed

 
receive
 

seventh

 
recommendation
 

cognizance

 

adjourned

 

presented

 

letter


communication

 

Richmond

 

gentleman

 

states

 

connection

 

Legislature

 

length

 

reviewing

 

Commissioner

 

recollected


Convention
 

SEDDON

 

entirety

 

signed

 

ordered

 

reason

 

Missouri

 

President

 

regret

 

Journal