FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613  
614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   >>  
bsence what had been resolved when I was present. It is certainly with regret that I write this note. My preference was for a statement in which we all could join, but my associates refused to enter into any joint relation of the facts. I hope, also, it will not be inferred from any thing I have written, that I do not regret the omission to record New York as voting against what appeared to me an unwise and pernicious proposition. Though the importance of the vote has been greatly magnified, and the result in my opinion would not have been different if the vote of New York had been counted, as I believe some of the States not voting would, if necessary, have voted in the affirmative; and even if it had been otherwise, I think the action of the Convention was of no importance whatever; yet, I should wish this State, of which we are so proud, to appear always, even in a matter of ceremony, on the side of Freedom; ever loyal to the Constitution as it is, but against placing there a guaranty to slavery beyond the guarantees of our fathers. DAVID DUDLEY FIELD. NEW YORK, _March 20th, 1861._ * * * * * I.--_Extract from the Minutes of the New York Delegation, kept by their Secretary._ "WEDNESDAY, _February 27th, 1861._ "New York delegation met in the room, and Mr. Wadsworth moved that the New York delegation vote No on each of the sections of the committee's report. Messrs. Corning, Bronson, Granger, Wool, and Dodge opposed, urging that the vote of New York be given on each section as it was called. The majority overruled, and decided to have the Chairman declare that New York voted No on each section. "The question on the first section being called, Mr. King stated that one of the members of the delegation being called away to the United States Court, the delegation had taken a vote before he left, and he appealed to the justice of the Convention to have it so cast, stating that the vote of the delegation had been so cast on the previous day. "The Convention decided that no person could vote who was not present. "The delegation was divided." * * * * * II.--_Letter from the Chairman of the Massachusetts Delegation._ "WASHINGTON, _March 8th, 1861._ "MY DEAR SIR:--Your favor of the 6th instant is before me. After alluding to the fact that 'my seat in the Peace Convention was at the table directly under the President's chair, between him
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613  
614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   >>  



Top keywords:

delegation

 

Convention

 

section

 

called

 

decided

 

Delegation

 
voting
 
Chairman
 

States

 

importance


regret

 
present
 

Bronson

 

Granger

 
Corning
 

Messrs

 

directly

 
report
 

person

 

urging


opposed

 

committee

 

sections

 
WEDNESDAY
 

February

 
Secretary
 

President

 

Wadsworth

 

overruled

 

United


Massachusetts

 

stating

 

justice

 

appealed

 

members

 

divided

 

declare

 

question

 

alluding

 

WASHINGTON


previous
 

Letter

 

stated

 

instant

 

majority

 

written

 

omission

 

record

 

inferred

 

appeared