FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751  
752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   >>   >|  
d to strike out the words, "the year eighteen hundred," as the year limiting the importation of slaves; and to insert the words, "the year eighteen hundred and eight." Mr. GORHAM seconded the motion. Mr. MADISON. Twenty years will produce all the mischief that can be apprehended from the liberty to import slaves. So long a term will be more dishonorable to the American character, than to say nothing about it in the Constitution. On the motion, which passed in the affirmative,--New-Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, aye--7; New-Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Virginia, no--4. Mr. GOUVERNEUR MORRIS was for making the clause read at once, "the importation of slaves in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia, shall not be prohibited, &c." This he said, would be most fair, and would avoid the ambiguity by which, under the power with regard to naturalization, the liberty reserved to the States might be defeated. He wished it to be known, also, that this part of the Constitution was a compliance with those States. If the change of language, however, should be objected to, by the members from those States, he should not urge it. Col. MASON was not against using the term "slaves," but against naming North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia, lest it should give offence to the people of those States. Mr. SHERMAN liked a description better than the terms proposed, which had been declined by the old Congress, and were not pleasing to some people. Mr. CLYMER concurred with Mr. SHERMAN. Mr. WILLIAMSON said, that both in opinion and practice he was against slavery; but thought it more in favor of humanity, from a view of all circumstances, to let in South Carolina and Georgia on those terms, than to exclude them from the Union. Mr. GOUVERNEUR MORRIS withdrew his motion. Mr. DICKINSON wished the clause to be confined to the States which had not themselves prohibited the importation of slaves; and for that purpose moved to amend the clause, so as to read: "The importation of slaves into such of the States as shall permit the same, shall not be prohibited by the Legislature of the United States, until the year 1808;" which was disagreed to, _nem. con_.[4] [Footnote 4: In the printed Journals, Connecticut, Virginia, and Georgia, voted in the affirmative.] The first part of the Report was then agreed to, amended as follows: "The migration or importat
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751  
752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

Carolina

 
slaves
 

Georgia

 

importation

 

prohibited

 

clause

 
motion
 

wished

 

Virginia


affirmative

 

Connecticut

 

eighteen

 

GOUVERNEUR

 
hundred
 

MORRIS

 

liberty

 

SHERMAN

 

Constitution

 

people


thought

 

slavery

 
exclude
 
circumstances
 
humanity
 

practice

 
declined
 

pleasing

 
CLYMER
 
concurred

Congress
 

opinion

 
WILLIAMSON
 
proposed
 

description

 

purpose

 
printed
 
Journals
 

Footnote

 
disagreed

Report

 

migration

 

importat

 

amended

 

agreed

 

offence

 
confined
 

DICKINSON

 
withdrew
 

Legislature