FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754  
755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   >>   >|  
es before he came here, but would acknowledge that he had found them as liberal and candid as any men whatever.--_p_. 1451. [Footnote 7: He meant the permission to import slaves. An understanding on the two subjects of _navigation_ and _slavery_, had taken place between those parts of the Union, which explains the vote of the motion depending, as well as the language of General Pinckney and others.] Mr. PINCKNEY replied, that his enumeration meant the five minute interests. It still left the two great divisions of Northern and Southern interests. Mr. GOUVERNEUR MORRIS opposed the object of the motion as highly injurious.--A navy was essential to security, particularly of the Southern States;-- Mr. WILLIAMSON. As to the weakness of the Southern States, he was not alarmed on that account. The sickliness of their climate for invaders would prevent their being made an object. He acknowledged that he did not think the motion requiring two-thirds necessary in itself; because if a majority of the Northern States should push their regulations too far, the Southern States would build ships for themselves; but he knew the Southern people were apprehensive on this subject, and would be pleased with the precaution. Mr. SPAIGHT was against the motion. The Southern States could at any time save themselves from oppression, by building ships for their own use.--_p_. 1452. Mr. BUTLER differed from those who considered the rejection of the motion as no concession on the part of the Southern States. He considered the interests of these and of the Eastern States to be as different as the interests of Russia and Turkey. Being, notwithstanding, desirous of conciliating the affections of the Eastern States, he should vote against requiring two-thirds instead of a majority.--_p_. 1453. Mr. MADISON. He added, that the Southern States would derive an essential advantage, in the general security afforded by the increase of our maritime strength. He stated the vulnerable situation of them all, and of Virginia in particular. Mr. RUTLEDGE was against the motion of his colleague. At the worst, a navigation act could bear hard a little while only on the Southern States. As we are laying the foundation for a great empire, we ought to take a permanent view of the subject, and not look at the present moment only. Mr. GORMAN. The Eastern States were not led to strengthen the Union by fear for their own safety. He deprecated the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754  
755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

Southern

 
motion
 

interests

 

Eastern

 

essential

 

Northern

 
object
 

security

 

subject


considered

 

thirds

 

majority

 

requiring

 
navigation
 

notwithstanding

 

advantage

 

Turkey

 

Russia

 

general


desirous

 

conciliating

 
derive
 
affections
 
MADISON
 

concession

 
building
 

acknowledge

 
oppression
 
BUTLER

differed
 

afforded

 
rejection
 
maritime
 

permanent

 

empire

 
foundation
 
laying
 

safety

 
deprecated

strengthen

 

present

 

moment

 

GORMAN

 

situation

 

Virginia

 
vulnerable
 

stated

 
strength
 

RUTLEDGE