FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223  
224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   >>   >|  
safely be assumed that this is a recognition of the Bhaina's position as having once been lord of the land. A Kawar may still be admitted into the Bhaina community, and it is said that the reason of the rupture of the former equal relations between the two tribes was the disgust felt by the Kawars for the rude and uncouth behaviour of the Bhainas. For on one occasion a Kawar went to ask for a Bhaina girl in marriage, and, as the men of the family were away, the women undertook to entertain him. And as the Bhainas had no axes, the daughter proceeded to crack the sticks on her head for kindling a fire, and for grass she pulled out a wisp of thatch from the roof and broke it over her thigh, being unable to chop it. This so offended the delicate susceptibilities of the Kawar that he went away without waiting for his meal, and from that time the Kawars ceased to marry with the Bhainas. It seems possible that the story points to the period when the primitive Bhainas and Baigas did not know the use of iron and to the introduction of this metal by the later-coming Kawars and Gonds. It is further related that when a Kawar is going to make a ceremonial visit he likes always to take with him two or three Bhainas, who are considered as his retainers, though not being so in fact. This enhances his importance, and it is also said that the stupidity of the Bhainas acts as a foil, through which the superior intelligence of the Kawar is made more apparent. All these details point to the same conclusion that the primitive Bhainas first held the country and were supplanted by the more civilised Kawars, and bears out the theory that the settlement of the Munda tribes was prior to those of the Dravidian family. 3. Internal structure: Totemism. The tribe has two subdivisions of a territorial nature, Laria or Chhattisgarhi, and Uriya. The Uriya Bhainas will accept food cooked without water from the Sawaras or Saonrs, and these also from them; so that they have probably intermarried. Two other subdivisions recorded are the Jhalyara and Ghantyara or Ghatyara; the former being so called because they live in _jhalas_ or leaf huts in the forest, and the latter, it is said, because they tie a _ghanta_ or bell to their doors. This, however, seems very improbable. Another theory is that the word is derived from _ghat_, a slope or descent, and refers to a method which the tribe have of tattooing themselves with a pattern of lines known as _g
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223  
224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Bhainas

 

Kawars

 
Bhaina
 
family
 

theory

 
subdivisions
 

primitive

 
tribes
 
Internal
 

structure


Totemism
 
Dravidian
 

position

 

settlement

 
Chhattisgarhi
 

accept

 
nature
 

recognition

 

territorial

 

intelligence


apparent

 

superior

 

country

 

supplanted

 

civilised

 

conclusion

 

details

 

ghanta

 
forest
 

improbable


Another

 
refers
 

method

 

tattooing

 

descent

 

derived

 

assumed

 

intermarried

 

Saonrs

 

pattern


Sawaras

 

stupidity

 

called

 

safely

 

jhalas

 
Ghatyara
 
Ghantyara
 

recorded

 

Jhalyara

 

cooked