FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666  
667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   >>   >|  
concurrence or our neutrality, first Russia, then Austria, and by dealing with them generously to make them his friends in any subsequent quarrel with us. . . . Next he has been assiduously laboring to increase his naval means, evidently for offensive as well as for defensive purposes, and latterly great pains have been taken to raise throughout France and especially among the army and navy, hatred of England and a disparaging feeling of our military and naval means." Is it not strange that, even with such apprehensions, the destruction of the Union was so welcome in England that it blinded the eyes of her statesmen and her people? They should surely have seen that the establishment of a Latin empire under the protection of France, in the heart of the Spanish-American Republics, would open a field far more dangerous to British interests than a combination for a French port in Africa, and that in pursuing his policy the wily Emperor was providing a throne for an Austrian archduke as a compensation for the loss of Lombardy. There was a time when Lord Palmerston himself held broader and juster views of what ought to be the relations between England and the United States. In 1848 he suggested to Lord John Russell a policy which looked to a complete unification of the interests of the two countries: "If as I hope," said His Lordship, "we shall succeed in altering our Navigation Laws, and if as a consequence Great Britain and the United States shall place their commercial marines upon a footing of mutual equality with the exception of the coasting-trade and some other special matters, might not such an arrangement afford us a good opportunity for endeavoring to carry in some degree into execution the wish which Mr. Fox entertained in 1783, when he wished to substitute close alliance in the place of sovereignty and dependence as the connecting link between the United States and Great Britain? A treaty for mutual defense would no longer be applicable to the condition of the two countries as independent Powers, but might they not with mutual advantage conclude a treaty containing something like the following conditions:-- "1. That in all cases of difference which may hereafter unfortunately arise between the contracting parties, they will in the first place have recourse to the mediation of some friendly Power, and that hostilities shall not begin between them until every endeavor to settle their difference by such me
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666  
667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

United

 

States

 

England

 

mutual

 

treaty

 

difference

 
Britain
 
countries
 

France

 

interests


policy

 
afford
 

arrangement

 

special

 
Russia
 

opportunity

 

matters

 
endeavoring
 

entertained

 

wished


degree

 

execution

 

exception

 
succeed
 

altering

 
Navigation
 

Lordship

 

consequence

 

footing

 

equality


substitute

 

marines

 

generously

 

dealing

 

Austria

 

commercial

 

coasting

 

alliance

 

contracting

 

parties


concurrence
 

recourse

 

endeavor

 

settle

 

mediation

 

friendly

 

hostilities

 

conditions

 

neutrality

 

defense