FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622  
623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   >>   >|  
tarashtra infers that vice versa, it is the Supreme Soul that becomes the ordinary soul, for (as Nilakantha puts it in the phraseology of the Nyaya school) things different cannot become what they are not and unless things are similar, they cannot become of the same nature. Applying this maxim of the Nyaya it is seen that when the ordinary soul becomes the Supreme Soul, these are not different, and, therefore, it is the Supreme Soul that becomes the ordinary soul. Under this impression Dhritarashtra asks,--Well, if it is the Supreme Soul that becomes the ordinary soul, who is it that urgeth the Supreme Soul to become so? And if all this (universe) be indeed, that Soul, in consequence of the latter pervading and entering into everything, then divested of desire as the Supreme Soul is, where is the possibility of its action (action or work being the direct consequence of desire)? If it is answered that the universe is the Deity's lila (mere sport, as some schools of philosophy assert), then, as every sport is ascribable to some motive of happiness, what can be the happiness of the Deity, who, as presupposed, is without desire? 6. The Rishi answers--There is a great objection in admitting the complete or essential identity of things different, i.e., the ordinary soul and Supreme Soul being different, their identity cannot be admitted. As regards creatures, they flow continually from Anadi-yoga, i.e., the union of the Supreme Soul (which in itself is Unconditioned) with the conditions of space, time etc.; i.e., there is this much of identity, therefore between the ordinary and the Supreme Soul, but not a complete or essential identity. It is also in consequence of this that the superiority of the Supreme Soul is not lost (the opposite theory would be destructive of that superiority). The favourite analogy of the thinkers of this school for explaining the connection of the Supreme Soul with the universe is derived from the connection of Akasa with Ghatakasa, i.e., space absolute and unconditioned and space as confined by the limits of a vessel. The latter has a name, is moved when the vessel is moved, and is limited in space; while space itself, of which the vessel's space forms a part, is absolute and unconditioned, immovable, and unlimited. 7. Cars, elephants, horses, infantry, vehicles other than cars, and warriors fighting from the backs of camels. 8. Called also the Badava fire. 9. The allusion is to the incarnat
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622  
623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Supreme
 

ordinary

 

identity

 

consequence

 

desire

 

vessel

 
things
 

universe

 

connection

 

action


absolute
 

unconditioned

 

essential

 
complete
 
superiority
 
happiness
 

school

 
confined
 

explaining

 

thinkers


favourite

 

analogy

 

derived

 

Ghatakasa

 

destructive

 
opposite
 

conditions

 
phraseology
 

theory

 

Nilakantha


fighting

 

warriors

 

camels

 

allusion

 
incarnat
 

Called

 
Badava
 

vehicles

 

infantry

 

limited


tarashtra

 

infers

 

immovable

 
elephants
 

horses

 
unlimited
 
limits
 

impression

 
answered
 
Dhritarashtra