FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124  
125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   >>   >|  
ussia is treated as a pariah, no settlement of the Far East can be stable. But what part Russia is going to play in the affairs of China it is as yet impossible to say. FOOTNOTES: [Footnote 63: On this subject George Gleason, _What Shall I Think of Japan?_ pp. 174-5, says: "This paragraph concerns the iron and steel mills at the city of Hanyang, which, with Wuchang and Hangkow, form the Upper Yangtze commercial centre with a population of 1,500,000 people. The Hanyeping Company owns a large part of the Tayeh iron mines, eighty miles east of Hangkow, with which there are water and rail connections. The ore is 67 per cent. iron, fills the whole of a series of hills 500 feet high, and is sufficient to turn out 1,000,000 tons a year for 700 years. [Probably an overstatement.] Coal for the furnaces is obtained from Pinghsiang, 200 miles distant by water, where in 1913 five thousand miners dug 690,000 tons. Japanese have estimated that the vein is capable of producing yearly a million tons for at least five centuries.... "Thus did Japan attempt to enter and control a vital spot in the heart of China which for many years Great Britain has regarded as her special trade domain." Mr. Gleason is an American, not an Englishman. The best account of this matter is given by Mr. Coleman, _The Far East Unveiled_, chaps. x.-xiv. See below, pp. 232-3.] [Footnote 64: See letter from Mr. Eugene Chen, _Japan Weekly Chronicle_, October 20, 1921.] [Footnote 65: The Notes embodying this agreement are quoted in Pooley, _Japan's Foreign Policies_, Allen & Unwin, 1920, pp. 141-2.] [Footnote 66: On this subject, Baron Hayashi, now Japanese Ambassador to the United Kingdom, said to Mr. Coleman: "When Viscount Kato sent China a Note containing five groups, however, and then sent to England what purported to be a copy of his Note to China, and that copy only contained four of the groups and omitted the fifth altogether, which was directly a breach of the agreement contained in the Anglo-Japanese Alliance, he did something which I can no more explain than you can. Outside of the question of probity involved, his action was unbelievably foolish" (_The Far East Unveiled_, p. 73).] [Footnote 67: The demands in their original and revised forms, with the negotiations concerning them, are printed in Appendix B of _Democracy and the Eastern Question_, by Thomas F. Millard, Allen & Unwin, 1919.] [Footnote 68: The texts concerned in the var
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124  
125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

Japanese

 
contained
 

Coleman

 

Hangkow

 

Unveiled

 

agreement

 

groups

 

subject

 

Gleason


Pooley
 
Question
 
quoted
 

Hayashi

 

Ambassador

 

Millard

 
Thomas
 

embodying

 

Foreign

 

Policies


concerned
 

account

 

matter

 

October

 

Chronicle

 

letter

 

Eugene

 

Weekly

 

Eastern

 

Kingdom


demands
 

Alliance

 

original

 

directly

 

breach

 

unbelievably

 

question

 

probity

 

action

 

foolish


Outside
 

explain

 

altogether

 

Viscount

 

printed

 
Appendix
 

Democracy

 

involved

 

revised

 

omitted