FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396  
397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   >>   >|  
there is a sort of argument in it,) you are a deceiver. If you will deceive in one way, why shouldn't you in another? So they apply for the use of your trade-mark. You are amazed and affronted. You retort that you are not that kind of person. Then they are amazed and affronted; and wonder "since when?" By this time you have got your bearings. You realize that perhaps there is a little blame on both sides. You are in the right frame, now. So you write a letter void of offense, declining. You mail this one; you pigeon-hole the other. That is, being old and experienced, you do, but early in your career, you don't: you mail the first one. II An enthusiast who had a new system of musical notation, wrote to me and suggested that a magazine article from me, contrasting the absurdities of the old system with the simplicities of his new one, would be sure to make a "rousing hit." He shouted and shouted over the marvels wrought by his system, and quoted the handsome compliments which had been paid it by famous musical people; but he forgot to tell me what his notation was like, or what its simplicities consisted in. So I could not have written the article if I had wanted to--which I didn't; because I hate strangers with axes to grind. I wrote him a courteous note explaining how busy I was--I always explain how busy I am--and casually drooped this remark: "I judge the X-X notation to be a rational mode of representing music, in place of the prevailing fashion, which was the invention of an idiot." Next mail he asked permission to print that meaningless remark. I answered, no--courteously, but still, no; explaining that I could not afford to be placed in the attitude of trying to influence people with a mere worthless guess. What a scorcher I got, next mail! Such irony! such sarcasm, such caustic praise of my superhonorable loyalty to the public! And withal, such compassion for my stupidity, too, in not being able to understand my own language. I cannot remember the words of this letter broadside, but there was about a page used up in turning this idea round and round and exposing it in different lights. Unmailed Answer: DEAR SIR,--What is the trouble with you? If it is your viscera, you cannot have them taken out and reorganized a moment too soon. I mean, if they are inside. But if you are composed of them, that is another matter. Is it your brain? But it could not be your brain. Po
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396  
397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

notation

 

system

 

letter

 

article

 

people

 

remark

 

shouted

 

amazed

 

affronted

 

musical


simplicities

 

explaining

 

attitude

 

worthless

 

influence

 

invention

 

prevailing

 

fashion

 

representing

 

casually


drooped

 
rational
 

answered

 

courteously

 

afford

 

meaningless

 
permission
 
withal
 
Answer
 
trouble

Unmailed

 

lights

 

turning

 

exposing

 

viscera

 
composed
 
matter
 

inside

 

reorganized

 

moment


superhonorable

 

loyalty

 

public

 

praise

 
caustic
 

sarcasm

 

compassion

 
broadside
 

remember

 

language