FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>   >|  
ardt, _Geschichte Roms von Valerian bis zu Diocletians Tod_ (1867); A. J. Mason, _The Persecution of Diocletian_ (1876); P. Allard, _La Persecution de Diocletien_ (1890); V. Schultze in Herzog-Hauck's _Realencyklopadie fur protestantische Theologie_, iv. (1898); Gibbon. _Decline and Fall_, chaps. 13 and 16; A. W. Hunzinger, _Die Diocletianische Staatsreform_ (1899); O. Seeck, "Die Schatzungsordnung Diocletians" in _Zeitschrift fur Social- und Wirthschaftsgeschichte_ (1896), a valuable paper with notes containing references to sources; and O. Seeck, _Geschichte des Untergangs der antiken Welt_, vol. i. cap. 1. On his military reforms see T. Mommsen in _Hermes_, xxiv., and on his tariff system, Diocletian, Edict of. DIOCLETIAN, EDICT OF (_De pretiis rerum venalium_), an imperial edict promulgated in A.D. 301, fixing a maximum price for provisions and other articles of commerce, and a maximum rate of wages. Incomplete copies of it have been discovered at various times in various places, the first (in Greek and Latin) in 1709, at Stratonicea in Caria, by W. Sherard, British consul at Smyrna, containing the preamble and the beginning of the tables down to No. 403. This partial copy was completed by W. Bankes in 1817. A second fragment (now in the museum at Aix in Provence) was brought from Egypt in 1809; it supplements the preamble by specifying the titles of the emperors and Caesars and the number of times they had held them, whereby the date of publication can be accurately determined. For other fragments and their localities see _Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum_ (iii., 1873, pp. 801 and 1055; and supplement i, 1893, p. 1909); special mention may be made of those of Elatea, Plataea and Megalopolis. Latin being the official language all over the empire, there was no official Greek translation (except for Greece proper), as is shown by the variations in those portions of the text of which more than one Greek version is extant. Further, all the fragments come from the provinces which were under the jurisdiction of Diocletian, from which it is argued that the edict was only published in the eastern portion of the empire; certainly the phrase _universo orbi_ in the preamble is against this, but the words may merely be an exaggerated description of Diocletian's special provinces, and if it had been published in the western portion as well, it is curious that no traces have been found of it. The articl
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Diocletian

 

preamble

 
maximum
 

portion

 

published

 

official

 

special

 

empire

 

fragments

 

provinces


Diocletians
 
Geschichte
 
Persecution
 

supplement

 

Latinarum

 

Inscriptionum

 
Plataea
 

Megalopolis

 

Elatea

 

Corpus


mention
 

emperors

 

titles

 

Caesars

 

number

 

supplements

 

brought

 

Allard

 

determined

 

accurately


language
 

publication

 

localities

 

universo

 

phrase

 

argued

 

eastern

 

curious

 

traces

 

articl


western
 

exaggerated

 

description

 

jurisdiction

 

proper

 
variations
 

Greece

 

Provence

 

translation

 

portions