FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176  
177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   >>   >|  
ut one difficult to reconcile with English legal principles, since no act is legally _malum_ unless forbidden by law. This was pointed out by Chief Justice Vaughan in the celebrated judgment in the case of _Thomas_ v. _Sorrell_, when he rejected the distinction between _mala in se_ and _mala prohibita_ as confusing, and attempted to define the dispensing power of the crown by limiting it to cases of individual breaches of penal statutes where no third party loses a right of action, and where the breach is not continuous, at the same time denying the power of the crown to dispense with any general penal law. This judgment, as Sir William Anson points out, only showed the extreme difficulty of limiting the power ascribed to the crown, a standing grievance from the time that parliament had risen to be a constituent part of the state. So long as the legal principle by which the law was "the king's law" survived there was in fact no theoretical basis for such limitation, and the matter resolved itself into one of the great constitutional questions between crown and parliament which issued in the Revolution of 1688. The supreme crisis came owing to the use made by James II. of the dispensing power. His action in dispensing with the Test Act, in order to enable Roman Catholics to hold office under the crown, was supported by the courts in the test case of _Godden_ v. _Hales_, but it made the Revolution inevitable. By the Bill of Rights the exercise of the dispensing power was forbidden, except as might be permitted by statute. At the same time the legality of its exercise in the past was admitted by the clause maintaining the validity of dispensations granted in a certain form before the 23rd of October 1689. See Anson, _Law and Custom of the Constitution_, part i. "Parliament," 3rd ed. pp. 311-319; F. W. Maitland, _Const. Hist. of England_ (Cambridge, 1908), pp. 302, &c.; Stubbs, _Const. Hist._ ss. 290, 291. (W. A. P.) FOOTNOTE: [1] In this quotation the word _dispensatio_ still has its meaning of "economy": "we are bound by the necessary economy of things." Possibly its use by the pope in this connexion may have led to the technical meaning of the word _dispensatio_ in the medieval canon law. DISPERSION (from Lat. _dispergere_, to scatter), the act or process of separation and distribution. Apart from the technical use of the term, especially in optics (see below), the expressio
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176  
177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
dispensing
 

meaning

 

economy

 
exercise
 
limiting
 
dispensatio
 

parliament

 

Revolution

 

action

 

forbidden


judgment
 
technical
 

dispensations

 

granted

 

October

 

validity

 

Custom

 

Parliament

 

Constitution

 

admitted


Rights
 

expressio

 

inevitable

 
Godden
 

permitted

 
clause
 
optics
 

legality

 

statute

 

maintaining


DISPERSION

 

dispergere

 
quotation
 
scatter
 

things

 
Possibly
 

connexion

 

medieval

 

courts

 

process


separation

 

England

 
Cambridge
 

distribution

 
Maitland
 
FOOTNOTE
 

Stubbs

 

issued

 
breach
 

statutes