FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57  
>>  
a greater proportion of sand than in the case of the neighboring channels mentioned. The channel could therefore be more easily maintained. Engineers estimate that a channel with a 300-foot bottom would be needed. On the south shore of the lake, the side slopes should be on the 1 to 3 ratio, with provision for a 1 to 5 ratio at the end of five years. Dumped on shore, the material would reclaim considerable frontage, and eliminate the re-deposit of this material in the channel. Through the remainder of the route, the original excavation should be made with side slopes on the 1 to 5 ratio, with provision made for a 1 to 10 ratio in five years. The dredging of the 75 miles of the Pontchartrain Channel would amount to 97,200,000 cubic yards, it is estimated by engineers. The cost would be around $10,000,000. The annual maintenance, during the first five years, would amount to 8,880,000 cubic yards--an estimate based on a comparison with the other channels into the Gulf, and the character of the material to be excavated. This estimate is considered large--but even at that, it is only 118,400 cubic yards a mile a year, and the cost would be about $750,000, according to Colonel Dent. After five years, it would be less. Another proposed route, investigated by Colonel Dent, is through Lake Borgne. A canal some miles in length, through the marsh, would connect the lake with the Industrial Canal. This route has considerable maintenance advantages over the Pontchartrain route. The character of the bottom in Borgne is more or less the same as in Pontchartrain. Sooner or later, one of these channels will be built by the government. That it has not already been begun is due to the fact that the Canal has not yet been completed, and the expected development has not taken place. But there is no doubt that it will. [Illustration: TYPICAL BRIDGE ON CANAL] [Illustration: EMERGENCY DAM CRANE] WHY GOVERNMENT SHOULD OPERATE CANAL. It is the function of the state to provide port facilities in the form of docks, piers, warehouses, grain elevators, mechanical equipment, etc. But it is the duty of the national government to improve harbors, dredge streams, dig canals for navigation and irrigation, erect levees to protect the back country, and build locks and dams when needed. These are the premises from which the Hudson Dock Board reasons that the cost of construction and maintenance of the New Orleans Navigation
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57  
>>  



Top keywords:

material

 
Pontchartrain
 

estimate

 
channels
 

maintenance

 

channel

 
character
 

considerable

 

Illustration

 

amount


Colonel

 
government
 

needed

 

bottom

 

provision

 

Borgne

 

slopes

 
function
 

SHOULD

 

GOVERNMENT


OPERATE

 

expected

 

completed

 

TYPICAL

 

EMERGENCY

 
BRIDGE
 
development
 

national

 
levees
 

protect


country
 

premises

 

construction

 

Orleans

 
Navigation
 

reasons

 

Hudson

 

irrigation

 
warehouses
 

elevators


mechanical

 
facilities
 

equipment

 

streams

 

canals

 
navigation
 

dredge

 
harbors
 

improve

 

provide