sult and short odds accepted. Even Mr. Hutchings allowed
himself to hope for a favourable issue.
"You've done wonderfully well," was the burden of his conversations with
Roberts; "I should feel certain of success against any one but Gulmore.
And he seems to be losing his head--his perpetual abuse excites sympathy
with you. If we win I shall owe it mainly to you."
But on this particular morning Lawyer Hutchings had something to say to
his friend and helper which he did not like to put into plain words. He
began abruptly:
"You've seen the 'Herald'?"
"Yes; there's nothing in it of interest, is there?"
"No; but 'twas foolish of your father to write that letter saying you
had paid his Kentucky debts."
"I was sorry when I saw it. I know they'll say I got him to write the
letter. But it's only another incident."
"It's true, then? You did pay the money?"
"Yes; I was glad to."
"But it was folly. What had you to do with your father's debts? Every
house to-day should stand on its own foundation."
"I don't agree with you; but in this case there was no question of
that sort. My father very generously impoverished himself to send me
to Europe and keep me there for six years. I owed him the five thousand
dollars, and was only too glad to be able to repay him. You'd have done
the same."
"Would I, indeed! Five thousand dollars! I'm not so sure of that." The
father's irritation conquered certain grateful memories of his
younger days, and the admiration which, in his heart, he felt for the
Professor's action, only increased his annoyance. "It must have nearly
cleaned you out?"
"Very nearly."
"Well, of course it's your affair, not mine; but I think you foolish.
You paid them in full, I suppose? Whew!
"Do you see that the 'Herald' calls upon the University authorities to
take action upon your lecture? 'The teaching of Christian youth by an
Atheist must be stopped,' and so forth."
"Yes; but they can do nothing. I'm not responsible to them for my
religious opinions."
"You're mistaken. A vote of the Faculty can discharge you."
"Impossible! On what grounds?"
"On the ground of immorality. They've got the power in that case. It's a
loose word, but effective."
"I'd have a cause of action against them."
"Which you'd be sure to lose. Eleven out of every twelve jurymen in this
state would mulct an Agnostic rather than give him damages."
"Ah! that's the meaning, then, I suppose, of this notice I've just
|