FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323  
324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   >>   >|  
ge that they did so, except they can prove that the words of the statute, whereby the king is recognised to be the supreme Head of the Church of England, should show expressly that they intended to do so; as it is apparent that they do not. "There is none authority of Scripture that will prove that any one of the apostles should be head of the universal Church of Christendom. And if any of the doctors of the church or the clergy have, by any of their laws or decrees, declared any Scripture to be of that effect, kings and princes, taking to them their counsellors, and such of their clergy as they shall think most indifferent, ought to be judges whether those declarations and laws be made according to the truth of Scripture or not; because it is said in the Psalms, 'Et nunc Reges intelligite, erudimini qui judicatis terram': that is, 'O kings! understand ye, be ye learned that judge the world.' And certain it is that the Scripture is always true; and there is nothing that the doctors and clergy might, through dread and affection, [so well] be deceived in, as in things concerning the honour, dignity, power, liberty, jurisdiction, and riches of the bishops and clergy; and some of them have of likelihood been deceived therein."--Heads of Arguments concerning the Power of the Pope and the Royal Supremacy: _Rolls House MS._ [404] 26 Hen. VIII. cap. 2. [405] 26 Hen. VIII. cap. 13. [406] More warned Fisher of this. He "did send Mr. Fisher word by a letter that Mr. Solicitor had showed him, that it was all one not to answer, and to say against the statute what a man would, as all the learned men in England would justify."--_State Papers_, Vol. I. p. 434. [407] The act was repealed in 1547, I Edw. VI. cap. 12. The explanation which is there given of the causes which led to the enactment of it is temperate and reasonable. Subjects, says that statute, should obey rather for love of their prince than for fear of his laws: "yet such times at some time cometh in the commonwealth, that it is necessary and expedient for the repressing of the insolence and unruliness of men, and for the foreseeing and providing of remedies against rebellions, insurrections, or such mischiefs as God, sometime with us displeased, doth inflict and lay upon us, or the devil, at God's permission, to assay the good and God's elect, doth sow and set among us,--the which Almighty God and man's policy hath always been content to have stayed--that sharpe
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323  
324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

clergy

 

Scripture

 

statute

 

deceived

 
learned
 

Fisher

 

England

 

Church

 
doctors
 

explanation


temperate
 
Subjects
 

enactment

 

reasonable

 

supreme

 

answer

 

showed

 

expressly

 

justify

 

prince


Papers
 

recognised

 

repealed

 

permission

 

displeased

 

inflict

 
content
 
stayed
 

sharpe

 
policy

Almighty

 

cometh

 
commonwealth
 

expedient

 

repressing

 
insolence
 
insurrections
 

mischiefs

 

rebellions

 

remedies


unruliness

 

foreseeing

 

providing

 
intended
 

judicatis

 
terram
 

erudimini

 

intelligite

 

understand

 
universal