FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576  
577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   >>   >|  
Christ_, Appendix, Excursus 10; Andrews' _Life of our Lord_, and Gresswell's _Dissertations_. Suffice it here to say that the apparent inconsistency may be explained by any of several assumptions. Thus, first, and very probably, the Passover referred to by John, for the eating of which the priests were desirous of keeping themselves free from Levitical defilement, may not have been the supper at which the paschal lamb was eaten, but the supplementary meal, the Chagigah. This later meal, the flesh part of which was designated as a sacrifice, had come to be regarded with veneration equal to that attaching to the paschal supper. Secondly; it is held by many authorities on Jewish antiquities that before, at, and after the time of Christ, two nights were devoted yearly to the paschal observance, during either of which the lamb might be eaten, and that this extension of time had been made in consideration of the increased population, which necessitated the ceremonial slaughtering of more lambs than could be slain on a single day; and in this connection it is interesting to note that Josephus (Wars, vi, ch. 9:3) records the number of lambs slain at a single Passover as 256,500. In the same paragraph, Josephus states that the lambs had to be slain between the ninth and the eleventh hour (3 to 5 p.m.). According to this explanation, Jesus and the Twelve may have partaken of the passover meal on the first of the two evenings, and the Jews who next day feared defilement may have deferred their observance until the second. Thirdly; the Lord's last paschal supper may have been eaten earlier than the time of general observance, He knowing that night to be His last in mortality. Supporters of this view explain the message to the man who provided the chamber for the last supper, "My time is at hand" (Matt. 26:18) as indicating a special urgency for the passover observance by Christ and the apostles, before the regularly appointed day. Some authorities assert that an error of one day had crept into the Jewish reckoning of time, and that Jesus ate the passover on the true date, while the Jews were a day behind. If "the preparation of the passover" (John 19:14) on Friday, the day of Christ's crucifixion, means the slaughtering of the paschal lambs, our Lord, the real sacrifice of which all earlier altar victims had been but prototypes, died on the cross while the passover lambs were being slain at the temple. 2. Did Judas Iscariot Partak
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576  
577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

paschal

 

passover

 

observance

 

Christ

 

supper

 

single

 
Josephus
 

earlier

 
authorities
 

Jewish


sacrifice

 
slaughtering
 
Passover
 
defilement
 

explain

 
mortality
 

message

 
Supporters
 

provided

 

indicating


knowing
 

chamber

 

general

 

evenings

 

Andrews

 

partaken

 

Twelve

 

According

 
explanation
 

Gresswell


feared

 

Excursus

 

special

 

Thirdly

 

deferred

 

regularly

 

victims

 

Friday

 
crucifixion
 
prototypes

Iscariot
 

Partak

 
temple
 
preparation
 

assert

 
apostles
 

appointed

 

Appendix

 

reckoning

 
urgency