FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116  
117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   >>   >|  
ant-General Thomas?" I must say "No," as far as my knowledge extends. And I add that if you can give any tangible evidence upon the subject, I will thank you to come to this city and do so. Very truly your friend, A. LINCOLN. TELEGRAM TO GENERAL A. E. BURNSIDE. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, November 25, 1862. MAJOR-GENERAL BURNSIDE, Falmouth, Virginia: If I should be in boat off Aquia Creek at dark tomorrow (Wednesday) evening, could you, without inconvenience, meet me and pass an hour or two with me? A. LINCOLN. TO ATTORNEY-GENERAL BATES. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, November 29, 1862. HON. ATTORNEY-GENERAL. MY DEAR SIR:--Few things perplex me more than this question between Governor Gamble and the War Department, as to whether the peculiar force organized by the former in Missouri are State troops or United States troops. Now, this is either an immaterial or a mischievous question. First, if no more is desired than to have it settled what name the force is to be called by, it is immaterial. Secondly, if it is desired for more than the fixing a name, it can only be to get a position from which to draw practical inferences; then it is mischievous. Instead of settling one dispute by deciding the question, I should merely furnish a nest-full of eggs for hatching new disputes. I believe the force is not strictly either "State troops" or "United States troops." It is of mixed character. I therefore think it is safer, when a practical question arises, to decide that question directly, and not indirectly by deciding a general abstraction supposed to include it, and also including a great deal more. Without dispute Governor Gamble appoints the officers of this force, and fills vacancies when they occur. The question now practically in dispute is: Can Governor Gamble make a vacancy by removing an officer or accepting a resignation? Now, while it is proper that this question shall be settled, I do not perceive why either Governor Gamble or the government here should care which way it is settled. I am perplexed with it only because there seems to be pertinacity about it. It seems to me that it might be either way without injury to the service; or that the offer of the Secretary of War to let Governor Gamble make vacancies, and he (the Secretary) to ratify the making of them, ought to be satisfactory. Yours truly, A. LINCOLN TELEGRAM TO GENERAL CURTIS. [Cipher.] WA
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116  
117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

question

 

Governor

 

Gamble

 

GENERAL

 

troops

 

LINCOLN

 

dispute

 

settled

 

ATTORNEY

 

immaterial


deciding
 

practical

 

vacancies

 
States
 

United

 

mischievous

 

desired

 

Secretary

 
MANSION
 

WASHINGTON


November

 

EXECUTIVE

 
BURNSIDE
 

TELEGRAM

 

Without

 
including
 

practically

 

officers

 

appoints

 

abstraction


strictly
 

disputes

 
hatching
 
character
 

directly

 

indirectly

 

general

 

supposed

 

decide

 

arises


include
 

officer

 

service

 

injury

 
pertinacity
 

ratify

 

CURTIS

 

Cipher

 

satisfactory

 
making