FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259  
260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   >>   >|  
Workmen's Compensation Act 1906 to workmen, in respect of accidents in the course of their employment (see EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY); and under the Licensing Act 1904, to the payments to be made on the extinction of licences to sell intoxicants. The term "Compensation water" is used to describe the water given from a reservoir in compensation for water abstracted from a stream, under statutory powers, in connexion with public works (see WATER SUPPLY). As to the use of the word "compensation" in horology, see CLOCK; WATCH. Compensation, in its most familiar sense, is however a _nomen juris_ for the reparation or satisfaction made to the owners of property which is taken by the state or by local authorities or by the promoters of parliamentary undertakings, under statutory authority, for public purposes. There are two main legal theories on which such appropriation of private property is justified. The American may be taken as a representative illustration of the one, and the English of the other. Though not included in the definition of "eminent domain," the necessity for compensation is recognized as incidental to that power. (See Eminent Domain, under which the American law of compensation, and the closely allied doctrine of _expropriation pour cause d'utilite_ publique of French law, and the law of other continental countries, are discussed.) The rule of English constitutional law, on the other hand, is that the property of the citizen cannot be seized for purposes which are really "public" without a fair pecuniary equivalent being given to him; and, as the money for such compensation must come from parliament, the practical result is that the seizure can only be effected under legislative authority. An action for illegal interference with the property of the subject is not maintainable against officials of the crown or government sued in their official capacity or as an official body. But crown officials may be sued in their individual capacity for such interference, even if they acted with the authority of the government (cp. _Raleigh_ v. _Goschen_ [1898], 1 Ch. 73). _Law of England._--Down to 1845 every act authorizing the purchase of lands had, in addition to a number of common form clauses, a variety of special clauses framed with a view to meeting the particular circumstances with which it dealt. In 1845, however, a statute based on the recommendations of a select committee, appointed in the preceding year, was
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259  
260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

compensation

 
property
 

authority

 
public
 
Compensation
 

interference

 

English

 

purposes

 
capacity
 
government

American
 

officials

 

official

 

clauses

 

statutory

 

illegal

 

action

 

legislative

 
preceding
 
effected

committee

 

statute

 

recommendations

 

select

 

subject

 

maintainable

 
appointed
 
seizure
 

pecuniary

 
equivalent

seized

 
citizen
 

practical

 
result
 
parliament
 

circumstances

 
Goschen
 

constitutional

 

England

 
number

purchase

 

authorizing

 

common

 

Raleigh

 

framed

 

meeting

 
addition
 

individual

 

variety

 

special