FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82  
83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   >>   >|  
. E. Barnard)] [Illustration: FIG. 2.--COMET C, 1908, NOV. 16d. 13h. 10m. By permission of Yerkes Observatory (E. E. Barnard).] PLATE II. [Illustration: FIG. 3.--HALLEY'S COMET, 1910, APRIL 27. By permission of Helwan Observatory, Egypt.] [Illustration: FIG. 4.--HALLEY'S COMET, 1910, MAY 4. By permission of Yerkes Observatory (E. E. Barnard).] In the telescope the nucleus of a bright comet appears as an opaque mass, one or more seconds in diameter, the absolute dimensions comparing with those of the satellites of the planets, sometimes, indeed, equal to our moon. But the actual results of micrometric measures are found to differ very widely. In the case of Donati's comet of 1858 the nucleus seemed to grow smaller as perihelion was approached. This is evidently due to the fact that the coma immediately around the nucleus was so bright as apparently to form a part of it at considerable distances from the sun. G. P. Bond estimated the diameter of the actual nucleus at 500 m. That the nucleus is a body of appreciable mass seems to be made probable by the fact that, except for the central attraction of such a body, a comet would speedily be dissipated by the different attractions of the sun on different parts of the mass, which would result in each particle pursuing an orbit of its own. It follows that there must be a mass sufficient to hold the parts of the comet, if not absolutely together, at least in each other's immediate neighbourhood. How great a central mass may be required for this is a subject not yet investigated. It might be supposed that the amount of matter must be sufficient to make the nucleus quite opaque. But two considerations based on observations militate against this view. One is that an opaque body, reflecting much sunlight, would show a brighter continuous spectrum than has yet been found in any comet. Another and yet more remarkable observation is on record which goes far to prove not only the tenuity, but the transparency of a cometary nucleus. The great comet of 1882 made a transit over the sun on the 17th of September, an occurrence unique in the history of astronomy. But the fact of the transit escaped attention except at the observatory of the Cape of Good Hope. Here the comet was watched by W. H. Finlay and by W. L. Elkin as it approached the sun, and was kept in sight until it came almost or quite in contact with the sun's disk, when it disappeared. It should, if op
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82  
83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
nucleus
 
opaque
 
Illustration
 
permission
 

Barnard

 

Observatory

 

actual

 

central

 

bright

 

HALLEY


transit

 

sufficient

 

Yerkes

 

diameter

 

approached

 

militate

 

brighter

 
continuous
 
sunlight
 

reflecting


observations

 

matter

 
investigated
 

neighbourhood

 

subject

 

required

 
supposed
 

considerations

 

amount

 
watched

Finlay

 
escaped
 

attention

 

observatory

 
disappeared
 

contact

 

astronomy

 

history

 

record

 

observation


remarkable

 
Another
 
tenuity
 

September

 

occurrence

 

unique

 

transparency

 

cometary

 

spectrum

 
attractions