FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271  
272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   >>   >|  
s to dispose of other people's property, which no diplomatic etiquette about the difficulty of finding a proper representative for Germany could justify. The mode of representation might safely be left to the Confederation itself. It is not surprising to the Queen that Austria and Prussia should complain of Lord Palmerston's agreeing with Sweden, Russia, Denmark, and France upon the Protocol before giving Prussia and Austria any notice of it. [Pageheading: THE PROTOCOL] _Viscount Palmerston to Lord John Russell._ CARLTON GARDENS, _23rd June 1850._ MY DEAR JOHN RUSSELL,--The Queen has entirely misconceived the object and effect of the proposed Protocol. It does not "decide upon the fate of Holstein," nor is it "an attack upon Germany." In fact, the Protocol is to _decide_ nothing; it is to be merely a record of the wishes and opinions of the Power whose representatives are to sign it....[19] How does any part of this decide the fate of Holstein or attack Germany? Is not the Queen requiring that I should be Minister, not indeed for Austria, Russia, or France, but for the Germanic Confederation? Why should we take up the cudgels for Germany, when we are inviting Austria and Prussia, the two leading powers of Germany, and who would of course put in a claim for the Confederation if they thought it necessary, which, however, for the reasons above stated, they surely would not?... As to my having _agreed_ with Sweden, Russia, Denmark, and France before communicating with Prussia and Austria, that is not the course which things have taken. Brunnow proposed the Protocol to me, and I have been in discussion with him about it. It is _he_ who has communicated it to the French Ambassador, to Reventlow, and to Rehausen; I sent it privately several weeks ago to Westmorland, that he might show it confidentially to Schleinitz, but telling Westmorland that it was not a thing settled, but only a proposal by Russia, and that, at all events, some part of the wording would be altered. I have no doubt that Brunnow has also shown it to Koller; but I could not send it officially to Berlin or Vienna till Brunnow had agreed to such a wording as I could recommend the Government to adopt, nor until I received the Queen's sanction to do so. The only thing that occurs to me as practicable would be to say to Austria and Prussia that if, in signing the Protocol, they could add that they signed also in the name of the Confede
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271  
272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Austria

 

Protocol

 

Germany

 

Prussia

 
Russia
 

France

 

decide

 

Confederation

 
Brunnow
 

Holstein


Westmorland
 
attack
 

proposed

 

wording

 

Palmerston

 

agreed

 

Denmark

 

Sweden

 

surely

 

Rehausen


stated
 

reasons

 

privately

 

Reventlow

 

discussion

 

things

 
communicating
 
Ambassador
 

French

 
communicated

received

 

sanction

 
Government
 

recommend

 

signed

 
Confede
 
signing
 

occurs

 

practicable

 

Vienna


proposal

 

settled

 

confidentially

 
Schleinitz
 

telling

 
events
 

officially

 

Berlin

 

Koller

 
altered