FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307  
308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   >>   >|  
e may be no fortune to support the dignity in the family--is most desirable. The mode in which the public will take the introduction of it will however chiefly depend upon the merits of the first case brought forward. Dr Lushington appears to the Queen so unobjectionable in this respect that she cannot but approve of the experiment being tried with him. It would be well, however, that it should be done quietly; that it should not be talked about beforehand or get into the papers, which so frequently happens on occasions of this kind, and generally does harm. [Footnote 1: Member of Parliament for Rye 1881-1832, and Ripon 1835-1843, afterwards a member of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: he became a Peer (Lord Kingsdown) in 1858, having declined a peerage on the present and other occasions.] [Footnote 2: Dr Lushington was judge of the Admiralty Court: he had been counsel for, and an executor of, Queen Caroline. He declined the offer now suggested, and the subsequent debates on the Wensleydale Peerage show that the proposed grant would have been ineffectual for its purpose.] [Pageheading: DIPLOMATIC ARRANGEMENTS] _Queen Victoria to Viscount Palmerston._ WINDSOR CASTLE, _31st January 1851._ The Queen has received Lord Palmerston's letter of the 29th, in which he proposes a change in those diplomatic arrangements which she had already sanctioned on his recommendation, and must remark that the reasons which Lord Palmerston adduces in support of his present proposition are in direct contradiction to those by which he supported his former recommendation.[3] The principle which the Queen would wish to see acted upon in her diplomatic appointments in general, is, that the _good of the service_ should precede every other consideration, and that the selection of an agent should depend more on his personal qualifications for the particular post for which he is to be selected than on the mere pleasure and convenience of the person to be employed, or of the Minister recommending him. According to Lord Palmerston's first proposal, Sir H. Seymour was to have gone to St Petersburg, Lord Bloomfield to Berlin, and Sir Richard Pakenham to Lisbon; now Lord Palmerston wishes to send Lord Cowley to St Petersburg. The Queen has the highest opinion of Lord Cowley's abilities, and agrees with Lord Palmerston in thinking that Russia will, for some time at least, exercis
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307  
308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Palmerston

 

occasions

 

declined

 

Footnote

 
recommendation
 

diplomatic

 

Cowley

 

Petersburg

 
present
 

Lushington


support
 
depend
 

principle

 

desirable

 

letter

 

received

 

service

 

precede

 

appointments

 

general


supported
 

dignity

 

proposes

 

sanctioned

 

family

 

arrangements

 
remark
 
reasons
 

direct

 
contradiction

consideration

 

adduces

 
proposition
 

change

 

personal

 
Lisbon
 
wishes
 

Pakenham

 

Richard

 

Bloomfield


Berlin

 

highest

 

opinion

 
exercis
 

Russia

 
abilities
 

agrees

 

thinking

 

selected

 
qualifications