FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86  
87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   >>   >|  
ken, _Beitraege zur Geschichte der neueren Philosophie_, p. 54 _seq_.] [Footnote 2: Aristotle erred when he considered qualitative distinctions (_idem_ and _aliud_) ultimate. These are to be traced back to quantitative differences, and the _aliud_ or _diversum_ is to be replaced by _plus et minus_. There is nothing absolutely light, but only relatively. Since all things are distinguished only by "more or less," the possibility of mediating members or proportions between them is given.] Intermediate between Bacon and Descartes, both in the order of time and in the order of fact, and a co-founder of modern philosophy, stands Galileo Galilei (1564-1641).[1] Galileo exhibits all the traits characteristic of modern thinking: the reference from words to things, from memory to perception and thought, from authority to self-ascertained principles, from chance opinion, arbitrary opinion, and the traditional doctrines of the schools, to "knowledge," that is, to one's own, well grounded, indisputable insight, from the study of human affairs to the study of nature. Study Aristotle, but do not become his slave; instead of yielding yourselves captive to his views, use your own eyes; do not believe that the mind remains unproductive unless it allies itself with the understanding of another; copy nature, not copies merely! He equals Bacon in his high estimation of sensuous experience in contrast to the often illusory conclusions of the reason, and of the value of induction; but he does not conceal from himself the fact that observation is merely the first step in the process of cognition, leaving the chief role for the understanding. This, supplementing the defect of experience--the impossibility of observing all cases--by its _a priori_ concept of law and with its inferences overstepping the bounds of experience, first makes induction possible, brings the facts established into connection (their combination under laws is thought, not experience), reduces them to their primary, simple, unchangeable, and necessary causes by abstraction from contingent circumstances, regulates perception, corrects sense-illusions, _i. e_., the false judgments originating in experience, and decides concerning the reality or fallaciousness of phenomena. Demonstration based on experience, a close union of observation and thought, of fact and Idea (law)--these are the requirements made by Galileo and brilliantly fulfilled in his discoveries; this, the "indu
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86  
87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
experience
 

thought

 

Galileo

 
things
 

perception

 

observation

 

induction

 

understanding

 
opinion
 
modern

nature

 

Aristotle

 

supplementing

 

leaving

 

cognition

 

bounds

 

overstepping

 

defect

 

priori

 
concept

Beitraege
 

impossibility

 
process
 

observing

 

inferences

 

Geschichte

 

estimation

 
sensuous
 
Philosophie
 

equals


copies
 

contrast

 

conceal

 

neueren

 

illusory

 

conclusions

 

reason

 

fallaciousness

 

phenomena

 

Demonstration


reality

 

judgments

 

originating

 
decides
 

fulfilled

 

discoveries

 

brilliantly

 

requirements

 

reduces

 

primary