FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207  
208   209   210   211   212   213   >>  
[1197] Ps. xlvi. 4. [1198] Ecclus. l. 6. [1199] 1 John i. 7, combined with 1 Thess. v. 5. [1200] Isa. xviii. 4 (vg.). ADDITIONAL NOTES A.--St. Bernard's Description of the State of the Irish Church. _Life_, Secs. 7, 16, 17. In two passages of the _Life_ serious charges are made against the Irish Church of the early years of the twelfth century. These charges refer primarily to the dioceses of Armagh and Connor; but it is probable that those dioceses were typical of many other districts throughout the country. If St. Bernard's statements are true of them, they may be applied with little reserve to the greater part of Ireland. Indeed he himself gives us more than a hint that the abuses which he condemns were by no means confined to eastern Ulster (Sec. 19). It may be well, therefore, to bring them together and to discuss them. 1. There was no such thing as chanting at the canonical hours. In the whole bishopric of Armagh "there was none who could or would sing" (Sec. 7). "In the churches [of Connor] there was not heard the voice either of preacher or singer" (Sec. 16). We may suspect that there is some exaggeration here; for if church song was absolutely unknown, how could Malachy have "learnt singing in his youth" (Sec. 7)? But that St. Bernard's remarks are substantially correct need not be questioned. He is not speaking of the Irish Church as it was in its earlier period, but of its state at the time when it had probably fallen to its lowest depth. His assertion, therefore, is not disposed of by references to the chanting at the funerals of Brian Boroimhe in 1014 and Maelsechlainn in 1022 (O'Hanlon, p. 34). Indeed in the notices of those events in _A.F.M._ there is no express mention of ecclesiastical song. 2. At Armagh Confession was not practised (Sec. 7); in the diocese of Connor "nowhere could be found any who would either seek penance or impose it" (Sec. 16). It may be true that Confession had been much neglected among some classes of the people: Malachy on one occasion met a woman who had never confessed (Sec. 54), and the very fact that he put the question to her "whether she had ever confessed her sins" suggests that she was not singular in this respect. But it is remarkable that the _anmchara_ (soul-friend), or Confessor, is frequently mentioned in Irish literature. The obits of several persons to whom that title is given are recorded in the Annals in the twelfth century. And pen
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207  
208   209   210   211   212   213   >>  



Top keywords:

Church

 

Connor

 

Armagh

 

Bernard

 
chanting
 
Confession
 

confessed

 

Indeed

 

dioceses

 

charges


Malachy

 
twelfth
 

century

 

events

 
Maelsechlainn
 

Hanlon

 
express
 
ecclesiastical
 
notices
 

mention


assertion

 

earlier

 
period
 

speaking

 

substantially

 
correct
 

questioned

 

disposed

 
references
 
funerals

fallen
 

lowest

 
Boroimhe
 
anmchara
 

friend

 

Confessor

 

frequently

 

remarkable

 
respect
 

suggests


singular

 
mentioned
 

literature

 

recorded

 

Annals

 

persons

 

remarks

 

impose

 

neglected

 

penance