FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  
so much so, and the price of passage fare has been reduced so low on all of the prominent lines, that as a general rule the steamers are not now making much clear money on their passengers. The expense of keeping passengers was not half so great six years ago, as it is now; and there appears to be no safe means of permanent retrenchment. Nothing has been said of Insurance. This is a most costly item. The Havre Company pay on their two ships, which are worth about $900,000, nine and a half per cent. per annum; and Mr. Collins pays on his three ships, which are worth about $2,200,000, nine per cent. per annum. On the Havre steamers this amounts to $85,500 per year, which is nearly as much as the mail pay; and on the Collins, to $198,000 per annum. And these are among what we call the items of mail steamship expenditure. I do not know the sums paid by the United States Mail, or by the Pacific Mail Companies. I will here give the views of Messrs. Murray and Atherton on the cost of steam, as they replied to letters of inquiry, which I addressed them Sept. 14, 1857. Mr. Murray says in answer to _Query 2_. "It is certainly my impression that ocean steamers of sufficient speed to carry the mails with any thing like regularity, will not pay upon any route with which I am acquainted, without assistance from Government." _Query 5_: Can Parliament do better in economy than in her present mail contracts, all things considered? Mr. Murray replies: "I do not see how Parliament can avoid paying the large subsidies she does for the mail contracts under present circumstances." _Query 4_: Is the steamship stock of Great Britain, subsidized or unsubsidized, paying stock, and is there much disposition among capitalists to invest, even in the stock of subsidized companies? He replies: "I do not think the steamship stock of Great Britain to be in a very nourishing condition: in fact, I know of only one company (the Peninsular and Oriental) in which I should like to invest money." Mr. Atherton replies to a query regarding the cost of running steamers as follows: "As to whether the effective performance of high speed mail service is compatible with ordinary mercantile service without government subsidy, I am of opinion that the mutual relation of Speed and Cost in connection with long sea-voyages has never yet been duly appreciated by owners, managers, or agents in charge of steam shipping affairs. An acceleration of steaming
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

steamers

 
Murray
 

steamship

 

replies

 

invest

 

Atherton

 

present

 

contracts

 

Parliament

 

paying


Britain

 

subsidized

 

Collins

 

passengers

 

service

 

appreciated

 

owners

 

subsidies

 

circumstances

 

running


effective

 

considered

 

managers

 

acceleration

 

Government

 

assistance

 

steaming

 

affairs

 

shipping

 

charge


agents

 

things

 
economy
 
performance
 

condition

 

nourishing

 

opinion

 

company

 

Peninsular

 

government


mercantile

 

ordinary

 

Oriental

 

subsidy

 

mutual

 

connection

 

voyages

 

unsubsidized

 

capitalists

 
companies