FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   >>  
down the French: the hackneyed old Shaw touch. The characters are second-rate middle class, instead of being dukes and millionaires. The heroine gets kicked through the mud: real mud. Theres no plot. All the old stage conventions and puppets without the old ingenuity and the old enjoyment. And a feeble air of intellectual pretentiousness kept up all through to persuade you that if the author hasnt written a good play it's because hes too clever to stoop to anything so commonplace. And you three experienced men have sat through all this, and cant tell me who wrote it! Why, the play bears the author's signature in every line. BANNAL. Who? GUNN. Granville Barker, of course. Why, old Gilbey is straight out of The Madras House. BANNAL. Poor old Barker! VAUGHAN. Utter nonsense! Cant you see the difference in style? BANNAL. No. VAUGHAN. [contemptuously] Do you know what style is? BANNAL. Well, I suppose youd call Trotter's uniform style. But it's not my style--since you ask me. VAUGHAN. To me it's perfectly plain who wrote that play. To begin with, it's intensely disagreeable. Therefore it's not by Barrie, in spite of the footman, who's cribbed from The Admirable Crichton. He was an earl, you may remember. You notice, too, the author's offensive habit of saying silly things that have no real sense in them when you come to examine them, just to set all the fools in the house giggling. Then what does it all come to? An attempt to expose the supposed hypocrisy of the Puritan middle class in England: people just as good as the author, anyhow. With, of course, the inevitable improper female: the Mrs Tanqueray, Iris, and so forth. Well, if you cant recognize the author of that, youve mistaken your professions: thats all I have to say. BANNAL. Why are you so down on Pinero? And what about that touch that Gunn spotted? the Frenchman's long speech. I believe it's Shaw. GUNN. Rubbish! VAUGHAN. Rot! You may put that idea out of your head, Bannal. Poor as this play is, theres the note of passion in it. You feel somehow that beneath all the assumed levity of that poor waif and stray, she really loves Bobby and will be a good wife to him. Now Ive repeatedly proved that Shaw is physiologically incapable of the note of passion. BANNAL. Yes, I know. Intellect without emotion. Thats right. I always say that myself. A giant brain, if you ask me; but no heart. GUNN. Oh, shut up, Bannal. This crude medieval psychology
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   >>  



Top keywords:

BANNAL

 

author

 

VAUGHAN

 
passion
 
Barker
 

Bannal

 

middle

 

inevitable

 
improper
 

female


Tanqueray
 

recognize

 

Intellect

 

professions

 

emotion

 

mistaken

 

people

 

giggling

 
examine
 

Puritan


England

 

incapable

 

hypocrisy

 

supposed

 

attempt

 

expose

 

beneath

 

assumed

 

levity

 

Frenchman


speech

 

spotted

 
psychology
 

Pinero

 

medieval

 

proved

 

Rubbish

 
repeatedly
 
physiologically
 

perfectly


clever

 
written
 

pretentiousness

 

persuade

 
commonplace
 
Granville
 

signature

 

experienced

 

intellectual

 

millionaires