FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   >>  
nd winding. There are more spindles upon this frame than upon the slubber. The last drawing frame, except for very fine yarns spun from Egyptian or Sea Island staples, is the roving frame, similar in principle to the last two but containing still more spindles. It receives the rovings from the intermediate frame, combines two of them into one, twists them a little more, and winds them upon the spindle tubes. The Jack frame is similar except that its product is finer and smoother. [Illustration: _Sliver lappers in a Northern mill_] It is interesting to note, however, that the majority of improvements have been the fruit of the brains, not of Americans, but of Englishmen. Copeland points out that this may be due to the English desire to save in the consumption of cotton, but that more probably it is due to the development of fine spinning in England, in which most of the machines here described are chiefly valuable; and he ventures the prediction that now that American mills have definitely gone in for the finer counts, it may be expected that engineers here will apply themselves to the improvement of this machinery. [Illustration: _Drawing frames, turning slivers into roving_] The "Mule" Versus the Ring Spindle Spinning is the final process which turns the cotton into firm, coherent yarn, sufficiently twisted, and ready for the loom. The twist given to the thread by the previous machines has been only enough to make the fibers hold together. They are still comparatively loose and fluffy, and their tensile strength is slight. There are, in general, two types of spinning machines. The first, the mule, an English product. The second, radically different, is entirely American. It was invented in 1828 by James Thorpe, and immediately found some favor, but it was not until the Civil War that it was received on equal terms with the mule. Today, however, it dominates in the United States, the comparative figures in 1917 being: ring spindles 30,264,074; mule spindles 3,634,761. The disparity is growing greater every year, and the use of the ring is firmly established in other countries as well. The figures for 1907 were: _Mule_ _Ring_ England (1909) 39,800,000 7,900,000 Germany 5,740,000 3,722,000 France 4,122,000 2,481,000 Austria 2,307,000 1,277,000 Italy 1,015,000 1,852,000 R
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   >>  



Top keywords:

spindles

 
machines
 

product

 

Illustration

 

figures

 

American

 
England
 

spinning

 

English

 

cotton


roving

 

similar

 

Thorpe

 
immediately
 
invented
 

received

 

radically

 

comparatively

 

fluffy

 

fibers


tensile
 

strength

 
slight
 

general

 
disparity
 
growing
 

greater

 

Germany

 

countries

 
established

firmly
 
Austria
 
comparative
 
States
 

dominates

 

United

 

France

 

machinery

 

lappers

 
Northern

interesting

 

Sliver

 

smoother

 
spindle
 

majority

 

Copeland

 

points

 
desire
 

Englishmen

 

Americans