FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311  
312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   >>   >|  
ce), 1896. Italy, 1898, 1904. Holland, 1901 (in the Royal Bank or in private companies). Sweden, 1901 (as in Norway). Sec. 7. #The compensation plan in America#. Under the practical operation of the law of employers' liability in force in any American state until 1911, a very small proportion of the workers injured while at work were legally entitled to any indemnity, and a still smaller proportion could succeed in recovering any substantial amount. Employers, and the accident companies with which employers insured, either compromised the claims for small amounts or fought bitterly in the courts the claims of those who refused to compromise. When the courts awarded damages, large or small, a large part of the proceeds went for legal expenses. But a small proportion of the total costs to employers came as benefits to the victims of accidents. It appeared in an extensive investigation of the business of the large industrial insurance companies that but 28 per cent of the premiums paid by employers were paid to workmen as indemnity. Between 1911 and 1916 the laws have been changed to some extent in their application to selected occupations in at least 34 states and territories of the United States, and covering nearly all but some of the distinctly agricultural states. This remarkable development has been largely actuated and guided by a comparatively small group of socially minded nonworking class citizens rather than by either employees or organized workers. It is an encouraging example of what can be done by skilful methods, when conditions are ripe, in furthering righteous social legislation without the use of money or of corrupting influences. Sec. 8. #Standards for a compensation law#. The standards which, in detail, in one jurisdiction or another, have already been attained, and which are the provisional ideals now sought by reformers, may be briefly stated as follows.[2] All employments should be included, altho, as yet, there are various exceptions, such as farm labor and domestic service, employers with but few employees (the number excepted being one to five), and nonhazardous employments. Compensation should be granted for all injuries, suffered in the course of employment, that cause disability beyond a definite waiting period of three to seven days. Compensation should include medical attendance for a limited period, and two-thirds of the estimated loss of wages for disability, either tota
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311  
312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

employers

 
proportion
 
companies
 

workers

 
Compensation
 
indemnity
 

claims

 

compensation

 

states

 

employees


employments

 

period

 
disability
 

courts

 
corrupting
 

Standards

 

jurisdiction

 
standards
 

detail

 

influences


organized

 

encouraging

 

citizens

 

socially

 

minded

 
nonworking
 

furthering

 

righteous

 
social
 

conditions


skilful

 

methods

 

legislation

 

employment

 
definite
 

waiting

 

suffered

 

nonhazardous

 

granted

 
injuries

estimated
 
thirds
 

limited

 

include

 

medical

 

attendance

 

excepted

 

stated

 
briefly
 

reformers