mula.
If we, for example, according to the practice of chemistry, represent
an atom of carbon by C, an atom of hydrogen by H, an atom of oxygen by
O and the number of atoms contained in each combination of carbon by
n, we can express the molecular formula of each one of this series
thus,
C_{n}H_{2n+2}--Series of normal paraffin.
C_{n}H_{2n+2}O--Series of primary alcohol.
C_{n}H_{2n}O_{2}--Series of the monobasic oleic acids.
Let us take, for example, the last of this series and set one after
the other n = 1, n = 2, etc., we get the following results omitting
the compounds.
CH_{2}O_{2}--Formic Acid--boiling point 100 deg.--melting point 1 deg.
C_{2}H_{4}O_{2}--Acetic Acid--boiling point 118 deg.--melting point
17 deg.
C_{3}H_{6}O_{2}--Propionic Acid--boiling point 140 deg.--melting point--.
C_{4}H_{8}O_{2}--Butyric Acid--boiling point 162 deg.--melting point--.
C_{5}H_{10}O_{2}--Valerianic Acid--boiling point 175 deg.--melting
point--.
And so on to C_{30}H_{60}O_{2}, Melissic Acid, which melts first at
180 deg., and which has no boiling point, because it does not evaporate
without splitting up.
Here we see therefore a whole series of qualitatively different
bodies, produced by single quantitative additions of the elements and
always in the same proportions. This occurs absolutely where all
elements of the combinations change their quantity in the same
proportions, so with normal paraffin, C_{n}H_{2n} + 2: the lowest is
CH_{4} a gas, the highest known is C_{16}H_{34}, a body forming a hard
colorless crystal which melts at 21 deg. and boils at 278 deg. In both the
series each new step is reached through the introduction of CH_{2}, an
atom of carbon and two atoms of hydrogen, to the molecular form of the
preceding step, and this quantitative change in the molecular form
brings about a qualitatively different body.
These series are merely obvious examples. Almost universally in
chemistry, particularly in the different oxides of nitrogen, in the
oxi-acids of phosphorus or sulphur, one can see how "quantity suddenly
changes into quality" and how this so called "confused Hegelianism"
is, so to speak, inherent in things and events, and no one is ever
confused or beclouded by it, except Herr Duehring. If Marx is the
first to observe this, and if Herr Duehring points this out, without
understanding it (since he could not let so unheard of a crime pass),
he should explain which of the two, Marx or Duehri
|