FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   >>  
mishes, in which the Greek troops excelled, were usually brought on by accident. In such an army, it is evident that the services of many an able officer would be useless. A Greek general could only acquire and maintain a due influence over his troops by taking a rifle in his hand, and bounding over the rocks in advance of his soldiers. The best general, therefore, in the estimation of the soldiers, was the officer who could run fastest, see furthest, and fire with truest aim from behind the smallest possible projection of a rock. In cases where it became absolutely necessary to enforce obedience to an order, the captain required to be both able and willing to knock down the first man who dared to show any signs of dissatisfaction with the butt of his pistol. Many excellent European generals were not competent to emulate the fame to be gained in such a service. Matters were very little better in the fleet. The sailors were always paid in advance, or they refused to embark; if on a cruise, when the term for which they had been paid expired, they always returned home, unless prevented by an additional payment. While at sea, they frequently held councils to discuss the movements of their ships, and repeatedly compelled their captains to alter the plans adopted by the admiral; and sometimes they have been known to carry their ships home in defiance of their officers. Even the brilliant exploits of the fire-ships which destroyed the Turkish three-deckers, were entirely performed by volunteers, and are rather due to the daring courage of Kanaris, and a few other individuals, than to the naval skill of the Greek fleet. In the latter years of the war, when the Turks and Egyptians had, by the exertions of Sultan Mahmoud and Mohammed Ali, made some small progress in naval affairs, the fire-ships of the Greeks failed to produce any important results. Captain Hastings, observing the total difference between Greek and European warfare, avoided the error into which foreigners generally fell, of allowing their authority to be mixed up with that of others, over whose actions they could not exercise any efficient control. Instead of seeking a command, the imposing title of which might flatter his vanity, and impose on the rest of Europe, Hastings steadily refused to accept any rank, or place himself in any command, where he would have been unable to enforce obedience to his orders. By this means, and by the sacrifice of very large
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   >>  



Top keywords:

command

 

soldiers

 

advance

 

refused

 

troops

 

obedience

 
enforce
 
general
 

officer

 

Hastings


European

 

Mahmoud

 

Egyptians

 

Mohammed

 

Sultan

 

exertions

 

exploits

 

destroyed

 

Turkish

 
brilliant

defiance

 

officers

 

deckers

 

Kanaris

 

individuals

 

courage

 

daring

 

performed

 
volunteers
 

vanity


flatter

 

impose

 

Europe

 

control

 

efficient

 
Instead
 

seeking

 

imposing

 

steadily

 

accept


sacrifice

 
orders
 

unable

 

exercise

 

actions

 

observing

 
Captain
 

difference

 

results

 
important