FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220  
221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   >>   >|  
Here is a young man--they say he is a lord--who has written a volume of poetry; and these fellows, just because he is a lord, set upon him, laugh at him, and sneer at his writing. The young man will do something, if he goes on as he has begun. But these reviewers seem to think {276} that nobody may write poetry, unless he lives in a garret." Crabb Robinson told this long after to Lady Byron, who said, "Ah! if Byron had known that, he would never have attacked Wordsworth. He went one day to meet Wordsworth at dinner; when he came home I said, 'Well, how did the young poet get on with the old one?' 'Why, to tell you the truth,' said he, 'I had but one feeling from the beginning of the visit to the end, and that was--_reverence_!'" Lady Byron told my wife that her husband had a very great respect for Wordsworth. I suppose he would have said--as the Archangel said to his Satan--"Our difference is po[li = e]tical." I suspect that Fielding would, if all were known, be ranked among the unlucky railers at supposed paradox. In his _Miscellanies_ (1742, 8vo) he wrote a satire on the Chrysippus or Guinea, an animal which multiplies itself by division, like the polypus. This he supposes to have been drawn up by Petrus Gualterus, meaning the famous usurer, Peter Walter. He calls it a paper "proper to be read before the R----l Society": and next year, 1743, a quarto reprint was made to resemble a paper in the _Philosophical Transactions_. So far as I can make out, one object is ridicule of what the zoologists said about the polypus: a reprint in the form of the _Transactions_ was certainly satire on the Society, not on Peter Walter and his knack of multiplying guineas. Old poets have recognized the quadrature of the circle as a well-known difficulty. Dante compares himself, when bewildered, to a geometer who cannot find the principle on which the circle is to be measured: "Quale e 'l geometra che tutto s' affige Per misurar lo cerchio, e non ritruova, Pensando qual principio ond' egli indige."[439] {277} And Quarles[440] speaks as follows of the _summum bonum_: "Or is't a tart idea, to procure An edge, and keep the practic soul in ure, Like that dear chymic dust, or puzzling quadrature?" The poetic notion of the quadrature must not be forgotten. Aristophanes, in the _Birds_, introduces a geometer who announces his intention to _make a square circle_. Pope, in the _Dunciad_, delivers himself as follows, with a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220  
221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

circle

 

quadrature

 

Wordsworth

 
polypus
 
geometer
 

poetry

 
satire
 

reprint

 

Society

 

Walter


Transactions
 

difficulty

 

bewildered

 

guineas

 

recognized

 
multiplying
 

compares

 

quarto

 

proper

 
resemble

ridicule

 
zoologists
 

object

 

Philosophical

 

principio

 

chymic

 

practic

 
procure
 

puzzling

 

poetic


square

 

intention

 

Dunciad

 

delivers

 

announces

 

introduces

 

notion

 

forgotten

 

Aristophanes

 

misurar


cerchio

 

ritruova

 

affige

 

measured

 

geometra

 

Pensando

 
Quarles
 

speaks

 

summum

 

usurer