FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774  
775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   >>   >|  
islative resolutions did not advance because of it. [Footnote 939: _Ibid._, February 7.] A month later a letter addressed by several New Yorkers to the National Republican Executive Committee requested the postponement of the Baltimore convention.[940] "The country is not now in a position to enter into a presidential contest," it said. "All parties friendly to the Government should be united in support of a single candidate. Such unanimity cannot at present be obtained. Upon the result of measures adopted to finish the war during the present spring and summer will depend the wish of the people to continue their present leaders, or to exchange them for others. Besides, whatever will tend to lessen the duration of an acrimonious Presidential campaign will be an advantage to the country."[941] If the sentiment of this letter was not new, the number and character of its signers produced a profound sensation. William Cullen Bryant headed the list, and of the twenty-three names, seventeen were leading State senators, among them Charles J. Folger and James M. Cook. "This list," said the _Tribune_, "contains the names of two-thirds of the Unionists chosen to our present State Senate, the absence of others preventing their signing. We understand that but two senators declined to affix their name."[942] Greeley did not sign this letter, but in an earlier communication to the _Independent_ he had urged a postponement of the convention.[943] Moreover, he had indicated in the _Tribune_ that Chase, Fremont, Butler, or Grant would make as good a President as Lincoln, while the nomination of either would preserve "the salutary one-term principle."[944] [Footnote 940: It was called to meet on June 7.] [Footnote 941: Appleton's _Cyclopaedia_, 1864, p. 785.] [Footnote 942: New York _Tribune_, April 25, 1864.] [Footnote 943: New York _Independent_, February 25, 1864.] [Footnote 944: New York _Tribune_, February 23, 1864.] It is not easy to determine the cause or the full extent of the dissatisfaction with Lincoln among New York Republicans. Seward's influence and Weed's relations seriously weakened him. After the election of 1862 Radicals openly charged them with Wadsworth's defeat. For the same reason the feeling against Edwin D. Morgan had become intensely bitter. Seeing a newspaper paragraph that these men had been in consultation with the President about his message, Senator Chandler of Michigan, the prince of Radica
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774  
775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

Tribune

 
present
 

February

 

letter

 

President

 

Lincoln

 
Independent
 

senators

 

convention


postponement

 

country

 

called

 

principle

 
resolutions
 

advance

 

Cyclopaedia

 

Appleton

 

preserve

 

Moreover


addressed

 

earlier

 
communication
 
Fremont
 
Butler
 

nomination

 
determine
 

salutary

 
bitter
 
Seeing

newspaper
 

paragraph

 
intensely
 
Morgan
 

Chandler

 

Michigan

 
prince
 
Radica
 

Senator

 
message

consultation

 

feeling

 

reason

 

influence

 

relations

 

Seward

 
Republicans
 

Greeley

 
extent
 

dissatisfaction