FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783  
784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   >>   >|  
A bill was brought in for this purpose by the excellent Henry Thornton, and it passed through both houses without opposition. CATHOLIC RELIEF BILL, ETC. During this session Mr. Mitford moved for a committee of the whole house, to enable him to bring in "a bill to relieve, upon conditions, and under restrictions, persons called Protestant Catholic Dissenters, from certain penalties, to which Papists are by law subject." A reform in the penal statutes was at this time peculiarly called for, since a large body of Catholic Dissenters had recently formally protested against the temporal power of the pope, and his right to excommunicate princes, or to absolve subjects from their oath of allegiance; and had likewise disavowed the lawfulness of breaking faith with heretics, and the power claimed by their priests, of exempting men from moral obligations. The principles of the bill were generally approved, and it passed both houses without opposition: the bishops themselves expressing sentiments in its favour. Encouraged by this liberality of parliament, the church of Scotland transmitted from the general assembly a petition praying for the relief of the Test Act, as far as it applied to that country; and subsequently Sir Gilbert Elliot made a motion on the subject, but it was rejected by a large majority. BILL TO AMEND THE LAW ON LIBELS. On the 20th of May, Fox brought in a bill for empowering juries to try the question of law as well as fact, in prosecutions for libel. This subject was debated as a constitutional right, and not as a party question, and having obtained the support of Pitt, it passed the commons with very little opposition. In the lords, however, it was objected to as an innovation on the laws of the kingdom, and though warmly supported by Lords Camden, Grenville, and Loughborough, the motion for the second reading was negatived. FINANCIAL MEASURES. Previous to the introduction of his financial measures, Pitt proposed the appointment of a committee to inquire what had been the amount of the income and expenditure during the last five years, and what they might be expected to be in future; and also what alterations had occurred in the amount of the national debt since the 5th of January, 1786. This committee made its report on the 10th of May, when it appeared that the annual income had been L16,030,285, and the expenditure, including L1,000,000 for liquidating the national debt, L
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783  
784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

opposition

 

committee

 
subject
 

passed

 

called

 

amount

 

question

 
Catholic
 

Dissenters

 

expenditure


income

 

houses

 

brought

 

national

 
motion
 

innovation

 

support

 

commons

 

objected

 

obtained


LIBELS

 

majority

 
empowering
 
debated
 
constitutional
 

prosecutions

 
juries
 

kingdom

 
appointment
 
January

report
 

occurred

 
alterations
 
expected
 

future

 

including

 
liquidating
 
appeared
 

annual

 
reading

negatived

 

FINANCIAL

 

Loughborough

 

Grenville

 

warmly

 

supported

 
Camden
 

MEASURES

 
Previous
 

inquire