FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626  
627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   >>   >|  
ate the plan, called for it; alleging that it did not wholly sanction the measure. On a subsequent day, Sheridan, in addition to the demand made by Burgoyne, moved "for a copy of the appointment of the board of naval officers, and of such parts of their instructions, and of their report, as his majesty's discretion might deem proper to be made public with perfect consistency to the safety of the state." In consequence of these demands, Pitt found himself compelled to produce the papers, and in laying them upon the table, he introduced the Duke of Richmond's measure in the form of a general resolution. He moved, that "it appeared to the house, that to provide for securing the dockyards at Portsmouth and Plymouth, by a system of fortification, founded on the most economical principles, was an essential object for the safety of the state; intimately connected with the general defence of the kingdom; and necessary for enabling the fleet to act with full vigour and effect for the protection of commerce, the support of our distant possessions, and the prosecution of offensive operations in any future war." In his speech Pitt attempted to prove that the fortification of Portsmouth and Plymouth was a measure of absolute necessity; that the duke's plan was the best that could be devised; and that these fortifications would give a greater scope to the operations of our fleets, and have a direct tendency to diminish the standing army. The arguments were powerfully controverted by members in opposition, among the most distinguished of which was Sheridan, who argued, that the plan was, in itself and its consequences, both dangerous and unconstitutional, and that the report itself did not authorise or favour the plan. Sheridan remarked:--"These strongholds maintained by numerous and disciplined garrisons, will afford tenfold means of curbing and subduing the country more than would arise from doubling the present army establishment. Can any one imagine that the system now recommended will end with Portsmouth and Plymouth? May we not figure to ourselves the same board of officers, acting under the same instructions, and deliberating with the same data, while they take a circuit round the coasts. The reasons which justify this measure in the present instance, will apply to every port in the kingdom, which is sufficiently important to require defence. But the whole plan proceeds on two suppositions extremely improbable; first, that we sha
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626  
627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
measure
 

Plymouth

 

Sheridan

 

Portsmouth

 

present

 

safety

 
general
 

defence

 

operations

 

fortification


kingdom
 

system

 

report

 
officers
 
instructions
 
require
 

favour

 
authorise
 

unconstitutional

 

proceeds


dangerous

 

remarked

 

disciplined

 

numerous

 

maintained

 
strongholds
 

garrisons

 
suppositions
 

improbable

 

arguments


powerfully

 

tendency

 

diminish

 

standing

 
controverted
 

members

 
extremely
 

afford

 

argued

 

opposition


distinguished

 

consequences

 

important

 
acting
 

deliberating

 
figure
 
direct
 

justify

 
coasts
 
circuit