FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630  
631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   >>   >|  
, forests, and land revenues belonging to the crown, as well as to sell or alienate fee-farm and other unimprovable rents. This bill passed the commons, _netn. con._, after the adoption of certain amendments, moved by Mr. Jollife, to protect title-deeds, and to bind the commissioners to report their proceedings in parliament. In the house of lords, however, it met with the stern opposition of Lord Loughborough, who objected to the bill because it did not agree with the king's message; because it repealed two old acts, and created a new power for the sale of those lands, without any exception of the rents reserved in the former acts, for divers persons, and for other purposes mentioned in those acts; and because the powers granted to the commissioners were dangerous to the people and derogatory to the honour of the crown. Notwithstanding this opposition, the bill was ultimately carried and received the royal assent. In the midst of his exertions for financial reform, and before the Sinking-fund Bill passed into a law, a message was delivered to the house from the king, by the minister, stating, that it gave him great concern to inform the commons that it had not been possible to confine the expenses of the civil list within the annual sum of L850,000, now applicable to that purpose. This message was the more remarkable as, in 1782, when Pitt was chancellor of the exchequer, the king, in his speech from the throne, had stated that he had so regulated his establishments, that his expenses should not in future exceed his income. The sum now required to free his majesty from debt, contracted partly before and partly since that period, was L210,000; which sum, after considerable opposition, in the course of which the necessity of economy was strongly enforced, was ultimately voted. DEBATES ON INDIA, ETC. In consequence of the commutation tax, and the preventive measures taken against smuggling, the sale of tea at the East India-house had by this time increased nearly threefold. This enlarged trade, connected with other circumstances, induced the company to apply to parliament for an act, empowering them to make an addition to their funds. A petition to this effect was presented on the 25th of May, and Pitt proposed and carried a bill, which enabled the company to add L800,000 to their stock, and also to sell a surplus of L36,000 a year, received from the exchequer, over and above the annuities which they paid to th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630  
631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
opposition
 

message

 

expenses

 

parliament

 

commons

 

passed

 
company
 

received

 

exchequer

 

partly


carried
 

ultimately

 

commissioners

 
period
 
strongly
 
enforced
 

economy

 
contracted
 

necessity

 

considerable


income

 

stated

 

regulated

 

throne

 

speech

 
chancellor
 

establishments

 
annuities
 

required

 

majesty


DEBATES

 

future

 

exceed

 

preventive

 
empowering
 

connected

 
circumstances
 

induced

 

addition

 

enabled


presented

 

effect

 

petition

 
surplus
 

measures

 
smuggling
 
proposed
 

consequence

 
commutation
 
threefold