p.
94.)]
[Footnote 1341: Sept. 7, 1861.]
[Footnote 1342: Sept. 14, 1861.]
[Footnote 1343: Motley, _Correspondence_, II, p. 35. To his mother,
Sept. 22, 1861.]
[Footnote 1344: April, 1861.]
[Footnote 1345: Oct., 1861.]
[Footnote 1346: Oct., 1861. Article, "Democracy teaching by Example."]
[Footnote 1347: Nov. 23, 1861.]
[Footnote 1348: Cited by Harris, _The Trent Affair_, p. 28.]
[Footnote 1349: Robertson, _Speeches of John Bright_, I, pp. 177 _seq._]
[Footnote 1350: Gladstone Papers, Dec. 27, 1861.]
[Footnote 1351: State Dept., Eng., Vol. 78, No. 95. Adams to Seward,
Dec. 27, 1861. As printed in _U.S. Messages and Documents, 1862-63_, Pt.
I, p. 14. Adams' emphasis on the word "_not_" is unindicated, by the
failure to use italics.]
[Footnote 1352: _Ibid._, No. 110. Enclosure. Adams to Seward, Jan. 31,
1862.]
[Footnote 1353: Feb. 22, 1862.]
[Footnote 1354: State Dept., Eng., Vol. 80, No. 206. Adams to Seward,
Aug. 8, 1862. Of this period in 1862, Rhodes (IV, 78) writes that "the
most significant and touching feature of the situation was that the
cotton operative population was frankly on the side of the North." Lutz,
_Die Beziehungen zwischen Deutschland und den Vereinigten Staaten
waehrend des Sezessionskrieges_, pp. 49-53, makes an interesting analysis
of the German press, showing it also determined in its attitude by
factional political idealisms in Germany.]
[Footnote 1355: Palmerston MS., Aug. 24, 1862.]
[Footnote 1356: Aug. 30, 1862.]
[Footnote 1357: October, 1862. "The Confederate Struggle and
Recognition."]
[Footnote 1358: Nov. 4, 1862.]
[Footnote 1359: _The Index_, Nov. 20, 1862, p. 63. (Communication.)]
[Footnote 1360: Anthony Trollope, _North America_, London, 1862, Vol. I,
p. 198. The work appeared in London in 1862, and was in its third
edition by the end of the year. It was also published in New York in
1862 and in Philadelphia in 1863.]
[Footnote 1361: _The Liberator_, March 13, 1863, quoting a report in the
_New York Sunday Mercury_.]
[Footnote 1362: Lord Salisbury is quoted in Vince, _John Bright_, p.
204, as stating that Bright "was the greatest master of English oratory
that this generation--I may say several generations--has seen. I have
met men who have heard Pitt and Fox, and in whose judgment their
eloquence at its best was inferior to the finest efforts of John Bright.
At a time when much speaking has depressed, has almost exterminated,
eloquence
|