FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62  
63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   >>   >|  
ied to a commoner retains her title by courtesy only, but the precedency due to the widow of a knight is accorded to her. * * * * * =When the Daughter of a Duke= marries a peer she takes the precedency due to the rank of her husband; if she marries a commoner, precedency is accorded to her due to the daughter of a duke. * * * * * =Age confers no Precedency= on either sex. Equals in rank from the highest to the lowest take precedence according to the creation of their title and not as regards the age of the person bearing the title. As, for instance, a youthful duke would take precedence of an aged duke, if the title of the youthful duke bore an earlier date than that of the aged duke. The same rule applies equally to baronets and knights. When two earls are present at a dinner-party, the date of their respective patents of nobility decides the order of precedency due to them. A host or hostess should always consult a "Peerage" or a "Baronetage" if in doubt as to the precedence due to expected guests bearing titles; wealth or social position are not taken into account in this matter, it being strictly a question of date. * * * * * =The Precedence due to Ladies of Equal Rank= takes effect in the same manner. Thus, a young wife of a baronet takes precedence over the elderly wife of a baronet if the creation of her husband's title bears an earlier date. * * * * * =When the Claims to Precedency of Persons of Equal Rank= clash, the claims of a gentleman should be waived in favour of those of a lady, should the persons be of opposite sexes. Thus, if two couples of superior rank to the other guests were present at a dinner-party, the host should take down the lady of highest rank, and the hostess should be taken down by the gentleman of highest rank, in which case the lady second in rank should go in to dinner _before_ her husband, although the gentleman taking her down to dinner were of lower rank than her husband. * * * * * =Esquires, and the Wives of Esquires=, take precedence according to their social position. Members of Parliament have no precedence, though it is often accorded to them as a matter of courtesy, especially in the county which they represent; the wives of members of Parliament are likewise entitled to no precedence on the ground
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62  
63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

precedence

 

dinner

 

precedency

 

husband

 

highest

 

gentleman

 
accorded
 

bearing

 

youthful

 
hostess

present

 

earlier

 

Esquires

 

marries

 
baronet
 

social

 
matter
 

commoner

 

courtesy

 

Precedency


position
 

guests

 

creation

 

Parliament

 

manner

 
Claims
 

effect

 

Persons

 

claims

 

elderly


waived

 

county

 

Members

 

represent

 

entitled

 
ground
 

likewise

 
members
 

couples

 

opposite


persons

 
superior
 

taking

 

favour

 

patents

 

lowest

 
Equals
 

person

 
instance
 
retains