FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348  
349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   >>   >|  
ery unsavoury circumstances. A comparatively innocent though psychologically highly interesting and characteristic Socialist new formation has recently occurred in that ally of the Socialists, the Women's Social and Political Union. "In September 1907 a bombshell was thrown into the camp of the Women's Social and Political Union by the extraordinary action of Mrs. Pankhurst, who, as 'the founder,' announced that she had discharged the Executive Committee of the Union."[1172] In the words of an opponent: "Mrs. Pankhurst tore up the constitution, robbed the branches and members of all control over the National Committee, abolished the annual conference, and elected herself and a few personal friends as an autocratic permanent committee answerable to no one in the world and to sit at her pleasure."[1173] The consequence of this personal squabble among leaders for supremacy was of course the splitting up of the party, and the aggrieved ladies formed a new party, the "Women's Freedom League." Socialists never tire of declaiming against competition, and of praising co-operation. At present there are two "competitive" Women's Freedom societies. If they continue pushing the identical article of agitation, all custom will go to the larger party. Therefore we may expect that, unless the breach is healed, the two parties will agree to differ "on the basic principles of women's freedom" and will recommend slightly different political mixtures. The example of France, Germany, and other countries shows that the jealousy and envy of leaders and party tyranny is nowhere greater than among Socialists. It will not be easy for British Socialists to found a united party, especially as it is more difficult to create unity among individualistic Englishmen, who are by their nature impatient of restraint, than among Frenchmen and Germans, who are more used to co-operation and who through their military training have learned the necessity of discipline and the duty of obedience. FOOTNOTES: [1136] Quelch, _The Social-Democratic Federation_, p. 3. [1137] _Reformers' Year Book_, 1908, pp. 74, 75. [1138] _Annual Report, Social-Democratic Federation Conference 1906_, p. 2. [1139] Shaw, _The Fabian Society_, p. 23. [1140] The Secretary of the Fabian Society in _Daily Mail Year Book_, 1908, p. 72. [1141] _Reformers' Year Book_, 1906, p. 73. [1142] _Report of the Twenty-sixth Annual Conference, Social-Democratic Federation, 1906
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348  
349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Social
 

Socialists

 
Democratic
 

Federation

 

Reformers

 

personal

 
leaders
 

Committee

 
operation
 
Pankhurst

Freedom

 

Conference

 

Report

 

Fabian

 

Society

 
Annual
 

Political

 

principles

 

differ

 

breach


healed

 

greater

 
British
 

parties

 
France
 

slightly

 
recommend
 

mixtures

 

political

 
freedom

Germany
 

tyranny

 

jealousy

 

united

 

countries

 

learned

 

Quelch

 

Twenty

 

Secretary

 

FOOTNOTES


nature

 

impatient

 

restraint

 
Frenchmen
 
Englishmen
 

individualistic

 

difficult

 

create

 

Germans

 
necessity