ary report is arranged on that basis in
several parts:

[Sidenote: General cooperation.]

I. COOPERATION WITH THE ALLIED NAVIES IN GENERAL.
(1) Commander United States naval forces in Europe.
(2) Allied naval council.
(3) Naval staff representative, Paris.
(4) Naval staff representative, Rome.

[Sidenote: Naval Headquarters in London and Ireland.]

II. ACTIVITIES IN COOPERATION WITH THE BRITISH.
(1) United States naval headquarters, London.
(2) United States naval activities in Ireland.
(_a_) Battleship Division Six, Berehaven.
(_b_) Submarine detachment, Berehaven.
(_c_) Destroyers based on Queenstown.
(_d_) Subchaser Detachment Three based on Queenstown.
(3) United States naval air stations in Ireland; seaplane stations;
kite-balloon station.
(4) Battleship Division Nine.
(5) Mine Force.
(6) Subchaser Detachment One, based on Plymouth.
(7) United States Naval Air Stations, Great Britain, Seaplane Station,
Killingholme; Northern Bombing Group, Assembly and Repair Plant,
Eastleigh.
(8) Cross-channel Transport Service.

[Sidenote: Paris, Brest and coast districts.]

[Sidenote: Naval air stations.]

III. ACTIVITIES IN COOPERATION WITH THE FRENCH.
(1) Naval staff representative, Paris.
(2) United States naval headquarters, Brest.
(3) French coastal districts.
(4) Destroyers based on Brest.
(5) United States naval air stations on French coast:
(_a_) Seaplane stations.
(_b_) Dirigible stations.
(_c_) Kite-balloon stations.
(_d_) Assembly and repair plant, Pauillac.
(_e_) Aviation Training School, Moutchie.

[Sidenote: Radio stations, hospitals, etc.]

IV. OTHER COOPERATING ACTIVITIES.
(1) Naval liaison officer at Army General Headquarters.
(2) Naval Radio Station, Croix d'Hins.
(3) United States Naval Railway Battery.
(4) Naval Pipe-Line Unit.
(5) Stations not yet inspected or not to be visited.

V. UNITED STATES NAVAL AVIATION IN EUROPE.

VI. Y.M.C.A. AND SIMILAR ACTIVITIES.

VII. HOSPITAL FACILITIES, ETC.

VIII. CONCLUDING REMARKS.

I. COOPERATION WITH THE ALLIED NAVIES IN GENERAL.

[Sidenote: Varied character of Naval activities.]

It could hardly have been foreseen to what extent United States naval
activities in Europe would accumulate, and it is a fact that it has been
a growth by accretion rather than by system. The resultant fact is that
the supervision of the commander of United