t, No. 912, Documents,
Nos. 421 and 477). In setting down a number to represent the current price
of an article naturally a rough average had to be struck of the rates
charged in different parts of the country. Bulletin No. 77, for instance,
gives the retail price charged for butter at 226 places in 68 different
cities, situated in 39 different States. At one point in Illinois the
price quoted in 1906 was 22 cents, while at a point in Pennsylvania 36
cents was reported, but the prevailing price throughout the country ranged
from 26 to 32, so that these figures were set down in the table. A similar
method has been adopted for the other items. A special difficulty arises
in the case of beef, where the price varies according to the cut. The
price of wheat is not given in the extant fragment of the edict, but has
been calculated by Bluemner from statements in ancient writers. So far as
the wages of the ancient and modern workman are concerned we must remember
that the Roman laborer in many cases received "keep" from his employer.
Probably from one-third to three-sevenths should be added to his daily
wage to cover this item. Statistics published by the Department of
Agriculture show that the average wage of American farm laborers per month
during 1910 was $27.50 without board and $19.21 with board. The item of
board, therefore, is three-sevenths of the money paid to the laborer when
he keeps himself. One other point of difference between ancient and modern
working conditions must be borne in mind in attempting a comparison. We
have no means of knowing the length of the Roman working day. However, it
was probably much longer than our modern working day, which, for
convenience' sake, is estimated at eight hours.
[91] Wholesale price in 1909.
[92] Receives "keep" also.
[93] Eight-hour day assumed.
[94] _Cf._ Report of the Commissioner of Labor, pp. 622-625. In England
between one-third and one-fourth; _cf._ Bulletin, No. 77, p. 345.
[95] _Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum_, II, 5489.
[96] Wilmanns, _Exempla Inscriptionum Latinarum_, 1772.
[97] _Ibid._, 2037.
[98] _Ibid._, 1859.
[99] _Ibid._, 2054.
[100] _Ibid._, 2099.
[101] 23:48_f._
[102] _Cic., ad Att._, 5.21. 10-13; 6.1. 5-7; 6.2.7; 6.3.5.
[103] 6.17.
[104] _Captivi_, 489 _ff._
[105] _Livy_, 38. 35.
[106] Plautus, _Pseudolus_, 189.
[107] Some of the most important discussions of workmen's guilds among the
Romans are to be found in Waltzin
|