FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1712   1713   1714   1715   1716   1717   1718   1719   1720   1721   1722   1723   1724   1725   1726   1727   1728   1729   1730   1731   1732   1733   1734   1735   1736  
1737   1738   1739   1740   1741   1742   1743   1744   1745   1746   1747   1748   1749   1750   1751   1752   1753   1754   1755   1756   1757   1758   1759   1760   1761   >>   >|  
s shipped by a man named Lewis, of New Bedford, Massachusetts, and sold as a slave in New Orleans. After passing through several hands, and being flogged nearly to death, he made his escape, and five days ago, (March 5,) returned to his friends in Philadelphia. From the "Baltimore Sun," Dec. 23, 1838. "FREE NEGROES--Merry Ewall, a FREE NEGRO, from Virginia, was committed to jail, at Snow Hill, Md. last week, for remaining in the State longer than is allowed by the law of 1831. The fine in his case amounts to $225. Capril Purnell, a negro from Delaware, is now in jail in the same place, for a violation of the same act. His fine amounts to FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS, and he WILL BE SOLD IN A SHORT TIME." The following is the decision of the Supreme Court, of Louisiana, in the case of Gomez _vs_. Bonneval, Martin's La. Reports, 656, and Wheeler's "Law of Slavery," p. 380-1. _Marginal remark of the Compiler.--"A slave does not become free on his being illegally imported into the state."_ "_Per Cur. Derbigny_, J. The petitioner is a negro in actual state of slavery; he claims his freedom, and is bound to prove it. In his attempt, however, to show that he was free before he was introduced into this country, he has failed, so that his claim rests entirely on the laws prohibiting the introduction of slaves in the United States. That the plaintiff was imported since that prohibition does exist is a fact sufficiently established by the evidence. What right he has acquired under the laws forbidding such importation is the only question which we have to examine. Formerly, while the act dividing Louisiana into two territories was in force in this country, slaves introduced here in contravention to it, were freed by operation of law; but that act was merged in the legislative provisions which were subsequently enacted on the subject of importation of slaves into the United States generally. Under the now existing laws, the individuals thus imported acquire _no personal right_, they are mere passive beings, who are disposed of _according to the will_ of the different state legislatures. In this country they are to _remain slaves_, and TO BE SOLD FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE STATE. The plaintiff, therefore, has nothing to claim as a freeman; and as to a mere change of master, should such be his wish, _he cannot be listened to in a court of justice_." Extract from a speech of Mr. Thomson of Penn. in Congress, March 1, 1826, on the pr
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1712   1713   1714   1715   1716   1717   1718   1719   1720   1721   1722   1723   1724   1725   1726   1727   1728   1729   1730   1731   1732   1733   1734   1735   1736  
1737   1738   1739   1740   1741   1742   1743   1744   1745   1746   1747   1748   1749   1750   1751   1752   1753   1754   1755   1756   1757   1758   1759   1760   1761   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

slaves

 

imported

 
country
 

introduced

 

amounts

 

United

 

States

 

plaintiff

 

importation

 

Louisiana


sufficiently

 
established
 
change
 

prohibition

 
master
 
question
 

freeman

 

forbidding

 

acquired

 

evidence


failed

 

prohibiting

 

introduction

 

Thomson

 

speech

 

Extract

 

Congress

 

listened

 

justice

 
enacted

subject

 

generally

 
provisions
 

subsequently

 

legislatures

 
existing
 

personal

 
beings
 

disposed

 
individuals

acquire

 

legislative

 

merged

 
dividing
 

territories

 

Formerly

 
passive
 

examine

 

BENEFIT

 
remain