FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41  
42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   >>   >|  
one of the ecclesiastical) representatives of this doctrine, Hooker, declared, that "it was in the nature of things not absolutely impossible that men could live without any public form of government." Elsewhere he says that for men it is foolish to let themselves be guided, by authority, like animals; it would be a kind of fettering of the judgment, though there were reasons to the contrary, not to pay heed to them, but, like sheep, to follow the leader of the flock, without knowing or caring whither. On the other hand, it is no part of our belief that the authority of man over men shall be recognised against or beyond reason. Assemblies of learned men, however great or honourable they may be, must be subject to reason. This refers, of course, only to spiritual and ecclesiastical authority; but Locke, who followed Hooker most closely, discovered only too clearly what the immediate consequences of such assumptions would be, and tried to avoid them by affirming that the power of the sovereign, being merely a power entrusted to him, could be taken away as soon as it became forfeited by misuse, but that the break-up of a government was not a break-up of society. In France, on the other hand, Etienne de la Boetie had already written, when oppressed by the tyranny of Henry II., a _Discours de la Servitude Volontaire, ou Contr'un_ (in 1546), containing a glowing defence of Freedom, which goes so far that the sense of the necessity of authority disappears entirely. The opinion of La Boetie is that mankind does not need government; it is only necessary that it should really wish it, and it would find itself happy and free again, as if by magic. [8] "Cette liberte commun est une consequence de la nature de l'homme. Sa premiere loi est de veiller a sa propre conservation, ses premiers soins sont ceux qu'il se doit a lui-meme: et sitot qu'il est en age de raison, lui seul etant juge des moyens propres a le conserver, devient par la son propre maitre."--_Rousseau._ So we see how the upholders of the social contract are separated into a Right, Central, and Left party. At the extreme right stands Hobbes, whom the defenders of Absolutism follow; in the centre is Locke, with the Republican Liberals; and on the extreme left stand the pioneers of Anarchism, with Hooker the ecclesiastic at their head. But of all the theoretical defenders of the "social contract," only one has really worked out its ultimate cons
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41  
42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

authority

 

government

 
Hooker
 

defenders

 

social

 

follow

 

extreme

 

reason

 

propre

 
contract

Boetie

 

nature

 
ecclesiastical
 

things

 

conservation

 
premiere
 

veiller

 

raison

 

declared

 

premiers


impossible

 
mankind
 

disappears

 

opinion

 

liberte

 
commun
 

absolutely

 
consequence
 

Liberals

 
pioneers

Anarchism
 

Republican

 

centre

 
stands
 

Hobbes

 

Absolutism

 
ecclesiastic
 

worked

 

ultimate

 
theoretical

representatives

 

maitre

 
Rousseau
 

devient

 

conserver

 

necessity

 
moyens
 
propres
 

Central

 
separated