FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280  
281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   >>   >|  
ty proved unexpectedly strong, and after this year it practically superseded the National Republican party in New York. In 1829 the hand of its leaders was shown, when, in addition to its antagonism to the Masons, it became a champion of internal improvements and of the protective tariff. From New York the movement spread into other middle states and into New England, and became especially strong in Pennsylvania and Vermont. A national organization was planned as early as 1827, when the New York leaders attempted, unsuccessfully, to persuade Henry Clay, though a Mason, to renounce the Order and head the movement. In September 1831 the party at a national convention in Baltimore nominated as its candidates for the presidency and vice-presidency William Wirt of Maryland and Amos Ellmaker (1787-1851) of Pennsylvania; and in the election of the following year it secured the seven electoral votes of the state of Vermont. This was the high tide of its prosperity; in New York in 1833 the organization was moribund, and its members gradually united with other opponents of Jacksonian Democracy in forming the Whig party. In other states, however, the party survived somewhat longer, but by 1836 most of its members had united with the Whigs. Its last act in national politics was to nominate William Henry Harrison for president and John Tyler for vice-president at a convention in Philadelphia in November 1838. The growth of the anti-Masonic movement was due to the political and social conditions of the time rather than to the Morgan episode, which was merely the torch that ignited the train. Under the name of "Anti-Masons" able leaders united those who were discontented with existing political conditions, and the fact that William Wirt, their choice for the presidency in 1832, was not only a Mason but even defended the Order in a speech before the convention that nominated him, indicates that simple opposition to Masonry soon became a minor factor in holding together the various elements of which the party was composed. See Charles McCarthy, _The Antimasonic Party: A Study of Political Anti-Masonry in the United States, 1827-1840_, in the Report of the American Historical Association for 1902 (Washington, 1903); the _Autobiography of Thurlow Weed_ (2 vols., Boston, 1884); A.G. Mackey and W.R. Singleton, _The History of Freemasonry_, vol. vi. (New York, 1898); and J.D. Hammond, _History of Political Parties in the Stat
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280  
281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

presidency

 

national

 
movement
 

convention

 

leaders

 
united
 
William
 
Vermont
 

president

 

organization


Masonry
 

members

 

nominated

 
Political
 
Pennsylvania
 
conditions
 
political
 

History

 

strong

 
states

Masons

 

existing

 

choice

 

discontented

 

defended

 
speech
 

Morgan

 

episode

 

Parties

 

social


Hammond

 

ignited

 
Freemasonry
 

States

 

United

 

Boston

 

Report

 
Autobiography
 

Thurlow

 

Association


American

 

Historical

 

Antimasonic

 

factor

 

holding

 
simple
 
opposition
 

Washington

 

elements

 

McCarthy