medical men would treat this individual's case as one of
what it is fashionable now to call by the name of "self-suggestion," or
"expectant attention"--as if those phrases were explanatory, or meant
more than the fact that certain men can be influenced, while others
cannot be influenced, by certain sorts of _ideas_. This leads me to
say a word about ideas considered as dynamogenic agents, or stimuli for
unlocking what would otherwise be unused reservoirs of individual power.
One thing that ideas do is to contradict other ideas and keep us from
believing them. An idea that thus negates a first idea may itself in
turn be negated by a third idea, and the first idea may thus regain its
natural influence over our belief and determine our behavior. Our
philosophic and religious development proceeds thus by credulities,
negations, and the negating of negations.
But whether for arousing or for stopping belief, ideas may fail to be
efficacious, just as a wire, at one time alive with electricity, may at
another time be dead. Here our insight into causes fails us, and we
can only note results in general terms. In general, whether a given
idea shall be a live idea depends more on the person into whose mind it
is injected than on the idea itself. Which is the suggestive idea for
this person, and which for that one? Mr. Fletcher's disciples
regenerate themselves by the idea (and the fact) that they are chewing,
and re-chewing, and super-chewing their food. Dr. Dewey's pupils
regenerate themselves by going without their breakfast--a fact, but
also an ascetic idea. Not every one can use _these_ ideas with the
same success.
But apart from such individually varying susceptibilities, there are
common lines along which men simply as men tend to be inflammable by
ideas. As certain objects naturally awaken love, anger, or cupidity,
so certain ideas naturally awaken the energies of loyalty, courage,
endurance, or devotion. When these ideas are effective in an
individual's life, their effect is often very great indeed. They may
transfigure it, unlocking innumerable powers which, but for the idea,
would never have come into play. "Fatherland," "the Flag," "the
Union," "Holy Church," "the Monroe Doctrine," "Truth," "Science,"
"Liberty," Garibaldi's phrase, "Rome or Death," etc., are so many
examples of energy-releasing ideas. The social nature of such phrases
is an essential factor of their dynamic power. They are forces of
|